首页> 外文OA文献 >'Every Artist is a Cannibal/ Every Poet is a Thief': Copyright Law and Post-Modernism
【2h】

'Every Artist is a Cannibal/ Every Poet is a Thief': Copyright Law and Post-Modernism

机译:“每个艺术家都是食人族/每个诗人都是小偷”:版权法和后现代主义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Post-modernism is a cultural phenomenon that has arisen out of a crisis within modernism. It is distinguished by its negation of authorship, aggressively derivativeudstyle, and criticism of consumer capitalism. Post-modernism stands in opposition to copyright law. It embraces two positions, one more radical than the other. The first position holds that post-modernism and copyright law embody systems of reasoning that are absolutely incompatible. It advocates the transgression and abolition of copyright law. The second standpoint is that post-modernism should be tolerated and accommodated within a liberal regime of copyright law. It supports the expansion of the range and scope of defences available to copyright infringement. This paper declines to accept the partisan arguments about post-modernism and copyright law at face value. It has a revisionary purpose, to challenge the principles of post-modernism that have become received wisdom, and look at them anew. It recognises that the debate about post-modernism cannot afford to be conducted in terms of absolute moralizing judgments. Instead of heralding the movement as the harbinger of a new utopia, or denouncing the tradition as corrupt and complacent, it is more appropriateudto assess this cultural production in its social and economic context.udud...ududCopyright law is discussed in relation to the post-modern practices of parody and pastiche. For the purpose of illustration and example, it examines the regimes of Australia, and, to a lesser extent, the United States. Part 1 investigates copyright infringement, and theudlack of a parody defence in Australia. Part 2 considers the application of the copyright doctrine of fair use to parody in the United States. Part 3 examines the introduction of a compulsory licensing scheme for parody. Part 4 questions the need for moral rightsudprotection of authors against parodies of their work.
机译:后现代主义是一种文化现象,源于现代主义内部的危机。它以对作者身份的否定,积极的派生 udstyle和对消费资本主义的批评而著称。后现代主义反对版权法。它包含两个位置,一个比另一个更激进。第一个立场是,后现代主义和版权法体现了绝对不兼容的推理系统。它提倡侵犯和废除版权法。第二个观点是,后现代主义应被容忍并纳入自由的版权法制度之内。它支持扩大可用于版权侵权的抗辩范围和范围。本文拒绝以表面价值接受关于后现代主义和版权法的游击党论据。它具有修订的目的,以挑战已成为人们公认的智慧的后现代主义原理,并重新审视它们。它认识到,关于后现代主义的辩论不能以绝对道德的判断来进行。 ud ud ... ud ud与其说它是新的乌托邦的先驱者,不如说它是腐败和自满的传统,而是更恰当地 ud在社会和经济背景下评估这种文化生产。 ud ud ... ud ud关于模仿和模仿的后现代实践,讨论了法律。为了说明和举例,它考察了澳大利亚的政权,并在较小程度上考察了美国的政权。第1部分调查了版权侵权和在澳大利亚模仿模仿的 udlack。第2部分考虑了合理使用版权原则在美国对模仿的适用。第3部分探讨了强制模仿模仿许可方案的引入。第四部分质疑了作者应享有精神权利保护他人免受其作品仿冒行为的侵害的必要性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rimmer Matthew;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1997
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:48:27

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号