首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment policy change in relation to English language teaching and learning in China : a study of perspectives from two universities
【2h】

Assessment policy change in relation to English language teaching and learning in China : a study of perspectives from two universities

机译:与中国英语教学相关的评估政策变革-来自两所大学的观点研究。

摘要

In response to concerns about the quality of English Language Learning (ELL) education at tertiary level, the Chinese Ministry of Education (CMoE) launched the College English Reform Program (CERP) in 2004. By means of a press release (CMoE, 2005) and a guideline document titled College English Curriculum Requirements (CECR) (CMoE, 2007), the CERP proposed two major changes to the College English assessment policy, which were: (1) the shift to optional status for the compulsory external test, the College English Test Band 4 (CET4); and (2) the incorporation of formative assessment into the existing summative assessment framework. This study investigated the interactions between the College English assessment policy change, the theoretical underpinnings, and the assessment practices within two Chinese universities (one Key University and one Non-Key University). It adopted a sociocultural theoretical perspective to examine the implementation process as experienced by local actors of institutional and classroom levels. Systematic data analysis using a constant comparative method (Merriam, 1998) revealed that contextual factors and implementation issues did not lead to significant differences in the two cases. Lack of training in assessment and the sociocultural factors such as the traditional emphasis on the product of learning and hierarchical teacher/students relationship are decisive and responsible for the limited effect of the reform.
机译:为了回应对高等教育英语学习质量的担忧,中国教育部(CMoE)于2004年启动了大学英语改革计划(CERP)。通过新闻发布(CMoE,2005年)以及一份名为《大学英语课程要求》(CECR)的指导性文件(CMoE,2007年),CERP提出了对大学英语评估政策的两项重大更改,分别是:(1)强制性外部考试(大学)转变为可选状态英语四级考试(CET4); (2)将形成性评估纳入现有的总结性评估框架。本研究调查了两所中国大学(一所重点大学和一所非重点大学)的大学英语评估政策变化,理论基础和评估实践之间的相互作用。它采用了社会文化理论的观点来审查机构和教室级别的本地参与者所经历的实施过程。使用恒定比较方法进行的系统数据分析(Merriam,1998)表明,情境因素和实施问题并未导致这两种情况的显着差异。缺乏评估方面的培训以及诸如传统上对学习产品的重视以及师生之间的等级关系等社会文化因素是决定性的,是造成改革效果有限的原因。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chen Qiuxian;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号