首页> 外文OA文献 >Memory and metamemory of word-pair learning : an electrophysiological investigation
【2h】

Memory and metamemory of word-pair learning : an electrophysiological investigation

机译:单词对学习的记忆和元记忆:电生理研究

摘要

This dissertation investigates two factors related to human learning and memory processes. The first factor is the testing effect: in comparison to repeatedly study learnt materials, repeated testing is known to be beneficial for future remembering. According to the episodic context account of the testing effect, this beneficial effect of testing is related to a process which reinstates the previously learnt episodic information. The second factor is the delayed judgment of learning (JOL) effect: the metacognitive judgment is more accurate in predicting later remembering when there is a temporal delay between the learning and the judgment than without. Following the cue-utilization account, the delayed JOL is based on the accessibility of the learnt materials whilst the immediate JOL is based on item-characteristics. It is hypothesized that there is a similar retrieval process engaged during testing and/ or during a delayed JOL which enhances the memory performance or the prediction of its accuracy. The neural correlates of testing and JOLs were examined using the electrophysiological method. In the current study, word-pair learning was used as an example of learning and memory: Swahili-German word pairs in the testing experiment (Chapter 2) and German-German semantically-related word pairs in the JOL experiment (Chapter 3). The results showed that the event-related potential (ERP) of the immediate retrieval at testing resembles the ones of the subsequent remembering. However, the ERP of the delayed JOL did not show a similar pattern. In summary, the current data did not support the hypothesis that the similar mechanisms underlie the testing and the delayed JOL effects.
机译:本文研究了与人类学习和记忆过程有关的两个因素。第一个因素是测试的效果:与反复学习所学材料相比,众所周知,重复测试对将来的记忆是有益的。根据测试效果的情节情景说明,测试的这种有益效果与恢复先前学习的情节信息的过程有关。第二个因素是学习的延迟判断(JOL)效果:当学习和判断之间存在时间延迟时,元认知判断在预测以后的记忆时比没有认知时更准确。根据提示使用情况,延迟的JOL基于学习资料的可访问性,而直接的JOL基于项目特性。假设在测试期间和/或在延迟的JOL期间进行了类似的检索过程,这会增强内存性能或预测其准确性。使用电生理方法检查测试和JOL的神经相关性。在当前的研究中,单词对学习被用作学习和记忆的示例:测试实验中的斯瓦希里语-德语单词对(第2章)和JOL实验中的德语-德语语义相关单词对(第3章)。结果表明,在测试中立即检索事件相关的电位(ERP)与随后的记忆相似。但是,延迟的JOL的ERP并未显示出类似的模式。总而言之,当前数据不支持这样的假设:类似的机制是测试和延迟的JOL效应的基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bai Cheng-Hua;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号