首页> 外文OA文献 >Particules de négation dans les inscriptions sur bronze de la dynastie des Zhou
【2h】

Particules de négation dans les inscriptions sur bronze de la dynastie des Zhou

机译:周代青铜铭文中的否定粒子

摘要

This article is devoted to a semantico-syntactic analysis of the use of seven markers of negation in Early Archaic Chinese, especially in the Zhou bronze inscriptions. The negative BU yft which is used with intransitive verbal predicates or with adjectives, establishes a descriptive relationship between the subject and the predicate in its clause; it only shows a simple descriptive intention and takes an integral part in the presupposition. The negative marker FU $p is fully adverbial and is used, essentially, with transitive verbs. The marker FEI *f |= , establishes an attributive, descriptive relationship between the two terms of the predication inside the clause just as does BU; but it introduces a polemic value in expressing the falsity of a presupposition. The marker WU2 -g?~ , in contrast with WU1 nj) , does not come under the category of a deontic modality. The obligation which it shows does not come from the speaker (or from any other source) but is internal to the subject-predicate relationship. The negation in this case is to be taken as a statement of fact and not as an injunction. However, according to the observations here, WU2 -£jh refers to the epistemic modal category. That why it can express the double value of both "certainty" and "necessity" according to the context. The negative WANG -£~ (the negative counterpart of YOU~ift "existence" or "possession") is used to express the possession of dependence. In addition, because of its existential value, it allows for presenting certain terms in both a restrictive and an extensive sense. Finally WU3 -$fr~ is most often attached to a substantive and forms thus a marginal expansion (in a syntactically dependent position) serving to characterize a nominal phrase, a verbal phrase, or an entire clause.
机译:本文致力于对早期古汉语,尤其是周青铜铭文中使用的七个否定标记进行语义-句法分析。与非及物性言语谓词或形容词搭配使用的否定BU yft在主语和谓语的从句中建立了描述性关系。它仅显示了简单的描述意图,并在预设中占了不可或缺的部分。否定标记FU $ p完全是副词,本质上与及物动词一起使用。标记FEI * f | =和BU一样,在子句中的谓词的两个术语之间建立了描述性的描述关系;但是它在表达预设的虚假性方面引入了对立价值。与WU1 nj)相比,标记WU2 -g?〜不在宗法形式的范畴内。它显示的义务不是来自说话者(或任何其他来源),而是主语-谓语关系的内在义务。在这种情况下的否定应视为事实陈述,而不是强制令。但是,根据此处的观察,WU2-jh指的是认知模态类别。这就是为什么它可以根据上下文表达“确定性”和“必要性”双重价值的原因。否定的WANG-£〜(YOU〜ift的“存在”或“占有”的否定对等物)用来表示依赖的拥有。另外,由于它的存在价值,它允许在限制性和广泛意义上呈现某些术语。最后,WU3-$ fr〜最常附着在实体上,从而形成边际扩展(在句法上相关的位置),以表征名词短语,口头短语或整个从句。

著录项

  • 作者

    Redouane Djamouri;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1991
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 fre
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号