首页> 外文OA文献 >Performance of Multiple linear regression and Nonlinear Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic Techniques in Modelling House Prices
【2h】

Performance of Multiple linear regression and Nonlinear Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic Techniques in Modelling House Prices

机译:多元线性回归和非线性神经网络以及模糊逻辑技术在房价建模中的性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

House price prediction continues to be important for government agencies insurance companies and real estate industry. This study investigates the performance of house sales price models based on linear and non-linear approaches to study the effects of selected variables. Approach: Linear stepwise Multivariate Regression (MR) and nonlinear models of Neural Network (NN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy (ANFIS) are developed and compared. The GIS methods are used to integrate the data for the study area (Bathurst, Australia). Results: While it was expected that the nonlinear methods would be much better the analysis shows NN and ANFIS are only slightly better than MR suggesting questions about high R2 often found in the literature. While structural data and macro-finance variables may contribute to higher R2 performance comparison was the goal of this study and besides the Australian data lacked structural elements. The results show that MR model could be improved. Also, the land value and location explained at best about 45% of the sale price variation. The analysis of price forecasts (within the 10% range of the actual prediction) on average revealed that the non-linear models performed slightly better (29%) than the linear (26%). The inclusion of social data improves the MR prediction in most of the suburbs. The suburbs analysis shows the importance of socially based locations and also variance due to types of housing dominant. In general terms of R2, the NN model (0.45) performed only slightly better than ANFIS 0.39) and better than MR (0.37); but the linear MRsoc performed better (0.42). In suburb level, the NN model (7/15) performed better than ANFIS (3/15) but the linear MR (5/15) was better than ANFIS. The improved linear MR (6/15) performed nearly as well as the non-linear NN. Conclusion: Linear methods appear to just as precise as the the more time consuming non linear methods in most cases for accounting for the differences and variation. However, when a much more in depth analysis is required non linear methods may prove to be more valuable. Recommendation: More research is needed in the area of house price modelling including more structural elements, modern buyer beliefs, and the nature and type of risks noted in modern times.
机译:房价预测对于政府机构保险公司和房地产行业仍然很重要。本研究基于线性和非线性方法研究房屋销售价格模型的性能,以研究选定变量的影响。方法:开发并比较了线性逐步多元回归(MR)和神经网络(NN)与自适应神经模糊(ANFIS)的非线性模型。 GIS方法用于整合研究区域(澳大利亚巴瑟斯特)的数据。结果:尽管可以预期非线性方法会更好,但分析表明NN和ANFIS仅比MR稍好,这提示了文献中经常出现的有关高R2的问题。尽管结构数据和宏观金融变量可能有助于提高R2性能,但本研究的目标是,澳大利亚数据缺乏结构要素。结果表明,可以改进MR模型。而且,土地价值和位置最多可以解释约45%的销售价格变动。平均而言,对价格预测的分析(在实际预测的10%范围内)显示,非线性模型的绩效(29%)比线性模型(26%)略好。包含社交数据可改善大多数郊区的MR预测。郊区分析显示了基于社会位置的重要性,以及由于住房主导类型而引起的差异。从R2的一般情况来看,NN模型(0.45)的性能仅略高于ANFIS 0.39),也优于MR(0.37);但线性MRsoc的效果更好(0.42)。在郊区一级,NN模型(7/15)的性能优于ANFIS(3/15),但线性MR(5/15)的性能优于ANFIS。改进的线性MR(6/15)的性能几乎与非线性NN相同。结论:在大多数情况下,线性方法似乎与花费更多时间的非线性方法一样精确,以解决差异和差异。但是,当需要进行更深入的分析时,非线性方法可能更有价值。建议:在房价建模领域需要更多的研究,包括更多的结构要素,现代的购买者信念以及现代注意到的风险的性质和类型。

著录项

  • 作者

    Amri Siti; Tularam Gurudeo;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号