首页> 外文OA文献 >Depression and a Parenting Intervention: Can Caregiver Depression Bring a Good Parenting Intervention Down? The Case of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy
【2h】

Depression and a Parenting Intervention: Can Caregiver Depression Bring a Good Parenting Intervention Down? The Case of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy

机译:抑郁症和育儿干预:照顾者抑郁症可以降低良好的育儿干预吗?亲子互动治疗案例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Depressed caregivers who present for parenting assistance often display excess difficulties with maintaining positive parent-child interactions and report that they cannot manage their children's problem behaviours. In addition to this, they often report other life stressors such as marital distress, lack of social support and/or socioeconomic disadvantage. This confluence of problems means that engaging depressed caregivers in parenting services can be challenging and depression is believed to impede successful intervention outcomes. For example, research has shown that depressed participants are at increased risk of intervention dropout and that they more often fail to maintain positive parenting behaviours (Assemany & McIntosh, 2002; Forehand, Furey & McMahon, 1984). However, others have suggested that engagement in parenting interventions in order to improve parent-child relationships may provide additional benefits such as reducing caregiver stress and depressive symptoms (Sameroff, 2004). In this randomised controlled trial of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT), we assessed depression using three methods -- an interview, a self-report questionnaire and observation. We anticipated that nonattendance and attrition would be higher in depressed compared to nondepressed caregivers. In addition, those who attended 12 weeks of treatment (n = 68) were compared to those on a supported waitlist (n = 27); we expected that caregivers receiving PCIT would have greater declines in depressive symptoms than those on the waitlist. Participants were female caregivers (age M = 34, SD = 8.9) and their young children (ages 3 to 7). Caregivers were at risk of child maltreatment based on a child maltreatment inventory and reported that their children had clinical levels of externalising symptoms. Survival analysis showed that attrition was similar to previous studies of PCIT and there was no significant difference in attrition rate when depressed and nondepressed caregivers were compared. Measures of attendance such as the number of missed appointments also did not differ between groups. Regarding parenting outcomes, treatment participants showed greater improvements in observed interactions with their children than those on waitlist. Yet, the anticipated difference between depressed and nondepressed caregivers was not found; groups did not differ when we compared observed interactions with children prior to treatment and during treatment, with the exceptions of reflections/descriptions and negative talk. When depression was compared, it declined similarly and rapidly for caregivers regardless of whether they were receiving PCIT or were on the waitlist. Caregiver depression does not correlate with attendance and length of PCIT or observed parent-child interactions when participants are female caregivers with high risk of maltreatment and children with behaviour problems. In summary, study findings suggest that PCIT is an effective intervention for improving the observed parenting skills of both depressed and nondepressed caregivers with young children, but PCIT is not directly implicated in reducing caregivers' depressive symptoms.
机译:寻求父母帮助的沮丧照料者通常在维持积极的亲子互动方面表现出极大的困难,并报告说他们无法处理孩子的问题行为。除此之外,他们还经常报告其他生活压力源,例如婚姻困扰,缺乏社会支持和/或社会经济劣势。问题的汇合意味着让沮丧的看护人参与育儿服务可能具有挑战性,并且认为沮丧会阻碍成功的干预结果。例如,研究表明,抑郁的参与者干预辍学的风险增加,他们更经常无法保持积极的养育行为(Assemany&McIntosh,2002; Forehand,Fury&McMahon,1984)。但是,其他人则建议,为了改善亲子关系而参与父母教养干预可能会带来其他好处,例如减轻照顾者的压力和抑郁症状(Sameroff,2004)。在这项亲子互动疗法(PCIT)的随机对照试验中,我们使用访谈,自我报告调查表和观察三种方法评估了抑郁症。我们预计抑郁症患者的无人看护和损耗比非抑郁症护理者要高。此外,将接受12周治疗的患者(n = 68)与接受支持的等待治疗者(n = 27)进行了比较。我们期望接受PCIT的护理人员的抑郁症状下降幅度要比候补名单上的下降幅度更大。参加者是女性护理人员(M = 34,SD = 8.9)和他们的幼儿(3至7岁)。根据儿童虐待清单,看护者有遭受儿童虐待的风险,并报告他们的孩子具有外在症状的临床水平。生存分析显示,减员与以前的PCIT研究相似,并且比较抑郁和非抑郁保姆时的减员率没有显着差异。两组之间的出勤率指标(例如错过约会的次数)也没有差异。关于育儿结果,治疗参与者在观察到的与孩子的互动方面比在等待名单上的参与者表现出更大的改善。然而,没有发现抑郁和非抑郁照料者之间的预期差异。当我们比较观察到的与儿童在治疗之前和治疗期间的互动时,各组没有差异,除了反射/描述和负面谈话。当比较抑郁症时,无论护理人员是接受PCIT还是在候补名单上,护理人员的抑郁情况都类似且迅速下降。当参与者是极有可能受到虐待的女性看护者和有行为问题的儿童时,看护者的抑郁与PCIT的出勤时间,PCIT的持续时间或观察到的亲子互动无关。总而言之,研究结果表明,PCIT是一种有效的干预措施,可提高抑郁症和非抑郁症照护者对幼儿的观察到的育儿技能,但PCIT并不直接减轻照护者的抑郁症状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号