首页> 外文OA文献 >The ‘Comeback of Christendom’ or a ‘Christian Cosmopolis’?: dialogical possibility in the work of John Milbank
【2h】

The ‘Comeback of Christendom’ or a ‘Christian Cosmopolis’?: dialogical possibility in the work of John Milbank

机译:“基督教世界的复出”还是“基督教世界”?:约翰·米尔班克作品中的对话可能性

摘要

Often taken to be largely hostile to engagement in inter-religious or inter-faith dialogue, contemporary forms of conservative post-modern Christian theology such as Radical Orthodoxy have been dismissed as irrevocably closed to the possibility of meaningful dialogue taking place between them and alternative religious traditions. This rather fraught relationship has recently come to the fore through exchanges on the ABC.net.au website between Joshua Ralston, and John Milbank and Adrian Pabst over the relationship between Radical Orthodoxy and Islam. However, this article demonstrates that while Milbank’s later practice has indeed been characterised by a resort to a stance of out-narration in the context of inter-religious engagement, this does not fully reflect the space for dialogical possibility he allows for in his 1991 article, ‘The End of Dialogue’. Instead, the article examines the early proposal as containing within it an allowance for an alternative strand of engagement by Radical Orthodoxy, based on mutual co-operation of differing religious traditions where they share ‘coincidences of outlook’. The adoption of this strand as an addition to, not replacement of, the strand of out-narration displayed in Milbank’s mode of practice seems to point the way forward towards a more equitable arena of engagement for Radical Orthodoxy with manifestations of religious plurality, but also offers resources for a better representation of the internal foundational characteristics of the Radical Orthodoxy reading of the Christian narrative.
机译:通常被认为对参与宗教间或信仰间对话非常不利,当代形式的保守后现代基督教神学(例如激进东正教)已被驳回,因为它们不可避免地接近于他们与替代宗教之间进行有意义对话的可能性传统。最近,在约书亚·拉尔斯顿(Joshua Ralston)与约翰·米尔班克(John Milbank)和阿德里安·帕布斯特(Adrian Pabst)之间通过ABC.net.au网站上的交流就激进正教与伊斯兰教之间的关系脱颖而出。但是,本文表明,尽管米尔班克后来的做法的确以在宗教间接触的背景下诉诸过分叙事的立场为特征,但这并未完全反映出他在1991年的文章中所允许的对话可能性的空间。 ,“对话的终结”。取而代之的是,文章将早期建议视为在其中包含了激进东正教的另一种参与余地,这是基于不同宗教传统的共同合作,他们共享“观点的巧合”。在米尔班克的实践模式中采用这一分支作为对叙事分支的补充,而不是替代它,似乎为向激进正教的更加公平的交往领域指明了道路,该领域具有宗教多元性的表现,但也提供了一些资源,以更好地表现激进正统的基督教叙事读物的内部基本特征。

著录项

  • 作者

    Slater Angus M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号