首页> 外文OA文献 >Sovereignty, internal displacement and right of intervention: perspectives from the African Union’s constitutive act and the convention for the protection and assistance of internally displaced persons
【2h】

Sovereignty, internal displacement and right of intervention: perspectives from the African Union’s constitutive act and the convention for the protection and assistance of internally displaced persons

机译:主权,国内流离失所和干预权:非洲联盟宪法和保护和援助国内流离失所者公约的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The end of the cold war and the beginning of the new millennium brought with it a new phase in state relations in Africa as more persons became forcefully uprooted from their homes and their rights violated with impunity due to intractable internal conflicts amidst the Westphalian notion of sovereignty which frowns at interference in the internal affairs of any state which was the fulcrum upon which the United Nations (UN) and Organization of African Unity (OAU) was founded. This new awakening has increasingly made perception of sovereignty to be people oriented. In the case of the Africa which is the crux of this paper, the eventual change from OAU to AU was significant as the coming into force of African Union’s Constitutive Act and the Convention for the Protection and Assistance of Internally Displaced Persons climaxed major twist in the Africa’s perception of sovereignty and the right of intervention in relation to internally displaced persons (IDPs) within the continent. This article examines briefly the historical evolution of the concept of sovereignty and the right of intervention and their implications in the African context, and being conceptual and doctrinal in approach it analyses the context and legality of the African Union’s right of intervention arising from the regional treaties vis-à-vis the United Nations Charter with a view to vindicating the much celebrated ‘decisive break from the past’.It concludes that African Union’s current stance represents a bold and grandiose expression that is sincerely tailored towards ensuring effective human rights protection and humanitarian assistance for over 13 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Africa. Finally, the article contributes significantly to the scholarly debates surrounding right of intervention in relation to internal displacement as its resolution will in one or the other helps government and other stakeholders in their quest to curtail the scourge of intra and inter-state violence in Africa.
机译:冷战的结束和新千年的开始使非洲国家关系进入了一个新的阶段,由于威斯特伐利亚人主权观念中的棘手内部冲突导致更多人被迫从自己的家园中流离失所,其权利受到有罪不罚的惩罚反对干涉任何国家的内政,这是联合国(UN)和非洲统一组织(OAU)成立的支点。这种新的觉醒越来越使人们以主权为导向。就非洲而言,这是本文的重点,随着非盟《组织法》和《保护和援助国内流离失所者公约》的生效,在非洲的最终转变意义重大。非洲对非洲大陆内部的国内流离失所者的主权和干预权的看法。本文简要考察了主权概念和干涉权的历史演变及其在非洲背景下的影响,并从概念和学说的角度分析了非洲联盟从区域条约中产生的干涉权的背景和合法性。相对于《联合国宪章》,以证明备受赞誉的``过去的决定性突破''。结论是,非洲联盟目前的立场代表了一种大胆而宏伟的表达,真诚地量身定制以确保有效的人权保护和人道主义为非洲超过1300万国内流离失所者提供援助。最后,本文为围绕国内流离失所问题的干预权的学术辩论做出了重要贡献,因为该决议的一项决议将有助于政府和其他利益攸关方寻求减少非洲内部和国家间暴力的祸害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号