首页> 外文OA文献 >Changes in Quality of Emotional Processing in Trauma Narratives as a Predictor of Outcome in Emotion Focused Therapy for Complex Trauma
【2h】

Changes in Quality of Emotional Processing in Trauma Narratives as a Predictor of Outcome in Emotion Focused Therapy for Complex Trauma

机译:创伤性叙事中情绪处理质量的变化,作为复杂创伤的以情感为中心的治疗结果的预测指标

摘要

The present study tested a model of change in emotional processes over thecourse of Emotion Focused Therapy for Trauma (EFTT). The Classification of AffectiveMeaning States (CAMS; Pascual-Leone u26 Greenberg, 2005) specifies a sequential shiftfrom maladaptive and unproductive affective processes (i.e. global distress, fear andshame, and rejecting anger), through negative self-evaluation and expressing unmetneeds, to productive affective processes (i.e. hurt and grief, self-compassion, assertiveanger, and acceptance and agency) that aid in adaptive functioning. This study used theCAMS to examine changes in the quality of emotional processes during trauma narrativesin early and late sessions of EFTT. It was expected that a shift from unproductive toproductive affective processes over the course of therapy would be associated withresolution of abuse issues and reduction in trauma symptomology at therapy termination.It was also anticipated that the shift in affective processes would follow the sequence aspresented in the CAMS. Results indicated a greater frequency of productive affectiveprocesses in late narratives; a greater frequency of productive processes was morepredictive of treatment outcome compared to unproductive processes; and greaterincrease in the frequency of productive processes from early to late narrativessignificantly contributed to good treatment outcome. Findings also revealed a significantinteraction between unproductive and productive affective processes in predictingtreatment outcome. These findings are consistent with the proposed hypotheses of thepresent study. Finally, results indicated that clients were significantly more likely tofollow the proposed sequence for lower level processes, which supports the hypothesis.However, results did not produce similarly significant results for higher levels. Rather clients expressed higher levels of productive affective processes in late sessions that werenot preceded by lower levels of processes in the proposed model. The findings haveimplications for guiding the therapeutic process in a productive manner that leads totrauma recovery.
机译:本研究测试了在针对创伤的情感治疗(EFTT)过程中情感过程变化的模型。 《情感平均状态分类》(CAMS; Pascual-Leone u26 Greenberg,2005年)通过负面的自我评价和表达不满足的情绪,从不适应和非生产性的情感过程(即全球困扰,恐惧和羞耻以及拒绝愤怒)依次转变为生产性有助于适应性功能的情感过程(例如,痛苦和悲伤,自我同情,自信和接纳和代理)。这项研究使用CAMS来检查EFTT早期和晚期创伤叙事期间情绪过程质量的变化。预期在治疗过程中从非生产性情感过程向生产性情感过程的转变将与滥用问题的解决以及治疗终止时创伤症状的减轻相关;还预期情感过程的转变将遵循CAMS中提出的顺序。 。结果表明,后期叙述中产生性情感过程的频率更高。与非生产过程相比,生产过程的频率越高,治疗结果的预测性越高;从早期到晚期叙述的生产过程频率的增加显着促进了良好的治疗效果。研究结果还揭示了非生产性和生产性情感过程之间在预测治疗结果方面的显着相互作用。这些发现与本研究提出的假设是一致的。最后,结果表明客户对于遵循较低级别流程的提议序列的可能性更大,这支持了这一假设。但是,对于较高级别的客户而言,结果并未产生类似的显着结果。相反,客户在后期会议中表示较高水平的生产性情感过程,而在拟议模型中未出现较低水平的过程。这些发现对于以导致创伤恢复的生产性方式指导治疗过程具有启示。

著录项

  • 作者

    Khayyat-Abuaita Ula;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号