首页> 外文OA文献 >A Ladder and a Cave
【2h】

A Ladder and a Cave

机译:梯子和山洞

摘要

Wittgenstein's Tractatus does, at a first glance, employ a Platonic strategy, dividing the universe of discourse into two realms, with an atemporal, rationally transparent order determining a lower stratum. On closer inspection the Tractatus' „prototypes“ (Urbilder) come surprisingly close to Platonic ideas. The Wittgensteinian metaphor of a ladder may therefore profitably be compared to Plato's parable of ascent from a cave, the crucial difference being that Wittgenstein's image does not provide a return option. Feedback between the ideal and the real is, on the other hand, an essential ingredient of the success of Plato-style progress. The later Wittgenstein, consequently, rejects the metaphor of a ladder in favor of what might be called the trouble-free plateau of the ordinary. Yet, this is not his only lesson. He also considers a kind of reverse Platonism with the philosopher, confused about the way things are, in need of redemption.
机译:乍一看,维特根斯坦(Wittgenstein)的《论经》确实采用柏拉图策略,将话语范围划分为两个领域,其时空,合理透明的顺序决定了较低的阶层。经过仔细检查,Tractatus的“原型”(Urbilder)出人意料地接近柏拉图式的思想。因此,将维特根斯坦的梯子隐喻与柏拉图从山洞上攀升的寓言进行有益的比较,关键的区别在于维特根斯坦的形象没有提供回报选择。另一方面,理想与现实之间的反馈是柏拉图式进步取得成功的重要因素。因此,后来的维特根斯坦(Wittgenstein)拒绝了阶梯的比喻,而赞成所谓的普通人的无故障高原。然而,这不是他唯一的教训。他还考虑了与哲学家的一种反向柏拉图主义,对事物的方式感到困惑,需要救赎。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hrachovec Herbert;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号