首页> 外文OA文献 >The industrious revolution, the industriousness discourse, and the development of modern economies
【2h】

The industrious revolution, the industriousness discourse, and the development of modern economies

机译:勤奋的革命,勤奋的话语和现代经济的发展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The idea of industriousness has been an ever-recurring issue since Max Weber launched it as a putative explanation of the advent of economic modernity. The notion of ’industrious revolution’ has provoked a renewed flourishing of publications focusing on this issue. Although most historians agree on the emergence of industriousness in seventeenth-century Europe, there is no consensus regarding the chronology, hence the real causes, of this mental and discursive shift. This article emphasizes the problematic role played by literary evidences in these social and cultural models of diffusion of new consumer values and desires. It then establishes the timing of the emergence of the ’industriousness discourse’ using an original approach to diffusion based both on the quantitative analysis of very large corpora and a close reading of seventeenth-century economic pamphlets and educational literature. It concludes first that there was not one but several competing discourses on industriousness. It then identifies two crucial hinges which closely match the chronology proposed by Allen and Muldrew, but refutes that championed by de Vries and McCloskey. The industrious revolution as described by these authors would have happened both too late to fit its intellectual roots and too early to signal the beginning of a ’consumer revolution’. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014.
机译:自从马克斯·韦伯(Max Weber)提出勤劳这个概念作为对经济现代性的来临的推定解释以来,它一直是一个反复出现的问题。 “工业革命”的概念引起了围绕这一问题的出版物的重新兴起。尽管大多数历史学家都同意勤奋精神在17世纪的欧洲出现,但对于这种精神和话语转变的年代,因此是真正的原因,仍未达成共识。本文强调文学证据在这些新的消费者价值观念和欲望传播的社会和文化模型中所扮演的问题性角色。然后,它基于对大型语料库的定量分析以及对17世纪经济手册和教育文献的仔细阅读,使用原始的扩散方法来确定“工业话语”出现的时机。首先得出的结论是,关于勤劳性的论述不止一个,而是数个。然后,它确定了两个至关重要的铰链,它们与艾伦和马尔德鲁提出的时间顺序极为匹配,但遭到了德弗里斯和麦克洛斯基的拥护。这些作者所描述的辛勤革命,为时已晚,以至于无法适应其思想根源,而且为时过早,无法预示“消费者革命”的开始。版权所有©剑桥大学出版社2014。

著录项

  • 作者

    Litvine Alexis David;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号