首页> 外文OA文献 >Could employment-focused policies spearhead economic recovery in Europe?
【2h】

Could employment-focused policies spearhead economic recovery in Europe?

机译:以就业为导向的政策能否带动欧洲经济复苏?

摘要

In Development Viewpoint #66 we assessed the performance of two contrasting strategies for debt reduction in the US: a ‘fiscal-contraction’ versus a ‘fiscal-expansion’ approach. In this Policy Brief we apply a similar ‘fiscal-expansion’ approach to economic recovery in Europe, focusing here on the need, first and foremost, to foster rapid growth in employment.ududEmployment generation should be a high priority for European policymakers, particularly because of secular declines in the size of the working-age population across the continent. Moreover, unemployment levels (especially among young workers) are unbearably high in many countries in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. So getting people back to work represents, indeed, one of the best strategies for debt reduction currently available.ududAs in past exercises, we use the State of the World Economy global macroeconomic model to gauge the impact of such a strategy. In this case, we construct a model scenario that programs changes in macroeconomic policies that are designed to stimulate an employment-focused economic recovery in Europe (as well as in the US). We then compare this scenario’s results with those of a ‘baseline’ scenario (based on no change in policies).ududWe are not interested in gauging short-term impacts alone so we extend our assessment through 2030. We present our results for blocs of countries (except for the UK and the US) because data in the model are aggregated in this fashion.ududWe start with the policy lever that has the most immediate potential to stimulate Europe’s economies—i.e., an increase in government expenditures. We also assume that these expenditures will help promote private investment. For example, they could be public investments in infrastructure, skills training or new cutting-edge technology. In order to reinforce the desired increase in private investment, we also assume a modest stimulus to bank lending.ududBoth public expenditures and private investment are marshalled to target an increase in employment, not economic growth alone. This target is based on the ratio of the number of employed to the number of people of working age. We calibrate the size of the stimulus in order to achieve a desirable, but also feasible, level of this ratio for each European bloc.
机译:在《发展观点66》中,我们评估了美国两种不同的债务削减策略的效果:“财政收缩”与“财政扩张”方法。在本政策简报中,我们将类似的“财政扩张”方法用于欧洲的经济复苏,在此首先关注促进就业快速增长的需求。 ud ud就业创造应是欧洲决策者的高度优先事项,尤其是由于整个非洲大陆的工作年龄人口数量普遍减少。此外,在全球金融危机之后,许多国家的失业率(尤其是年轻工人的失业率)高得令人难以忍受。因此,让人们重返工作确实是目前可用的减少债务的最佳策略之一。 ud ud在过去的练习中,我们使用《世界经济状况》全球宏观经济模型来评估这种策略的影响。在这种情况下,我们构建了一个模型方案,该方案对宏观经济政策的变化进行了规划,旨在刺激欧洲(以及美国)以就业为中心的经济复苏。然后,我们将此方案的结果与“基准”方案的结果(基于政策不变)进行比较。 ud ud我们对仅评估短期影响不感兴趣,因此将评估期延长至2030年。国家/地区集团(英国和美国除外),因为该模型中的数据是以这种方式汇总的。 ud ud我们首先从具有最直接的潜力来刺激欧洲经济的政策杠杆开始,即政府支出的增加。我们还假设这些支出将有助于促进私人投资。例如,它们可以是基础设施,技能培训或新尖端技术的公共投资。为了加强私人投资的预期增长,我们还假设对银行放贷采取了适度的刺激措施。公共支出和私人投资都被安排为增加就业的目标,而不仅仅是经济增长。该目标基于就业人数与工作年龄人口的比率。我们对刺激措施的规模进行校准,以使每个欧洲集团的这一比率达到理想的水平,也是可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号