首页> 外文OA文献 >Characterising food insecurity in pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in Uganda using a consumption coping strategy index
【2h】

Characterising food insecurity in pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in Uganda using a consumption coping strategy index

机译:使用消费应对策略指数描述乌干达牧区和农牧区的粮食不安全状况

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We explore the utility of a consumption coping strategy index (CSI) in characterising and assessing the factors influencing household food insecurity. We assessed 53 pastoral and 197 agro-pastoral households in Nakasongola and Nakaseke districts of Uganda, examining the use of 27 consumption coping strategies over a recall time of two 30-day periods, one at the start of a dry season in 2012 and one at the start of a rainy season in 2013.ududFour categorical food insecurity status measures were established - food secure (CSI 0 to 5) and mildly (CSI 6 to 20), moderately (CSI 21 to 42) and extremely (CSI >42) food insecure. For the dry season, the mean CSI was 29.4 ± 2.59 and 33.6 % of households were food secure, while for the rains, mean CSI was 33.1 ± 2.30 and 14.0 % of households were food secure. The combination of livelihood system, land holdings, number of livestock owned and belonging to a social network explained 9.4 % to 10 % of the variance in household food insecurity for agro-pastoralists, but variance for pastoralists was not explained by these factors. While the only highly significant factor associated with increasing household food insecurity in the dry season was low landholdings, in the rainy season, it was pastoral livelihood, low livestock holdings for agro-pastoralists and non-involvement in social networks.ududWhile our model identified a number of factors important in describing household food insecurity, it explained only about 10 % of the variance.
机译:我们探索了消费应对策略指数(CSI)在表征和评估影响家庭粮食不安全因素时的效用。我们评估了乌干达Nakasongola和Nakaseke地区的53个牧民家庭和197个农牧民家庭,研究了在两个为期30天的召回时间内对27种消费应对策略的使用情况,其中一种在2012年旱季开始,另一种在 ud ud确定了四种绝对的粮食不安全状况衡量指标-粮食安全(CSI 0至5)和中度(CSI 6至20),中度(CSI 21至42)和极度(CSI> 42)食物不安全。在旱季,平均CSI为29.4±2.59,有33.6%的家庭有粮食安全,而在雨季,平均CSI为33.1±2.30,有14.0%的家庭有粮食安全。生计系统,土地所有权,拥有和属于一个社会网络的牲畜数量的组合解释了农牧民家庭粮食不安全状况差异的9.4%至10%,但这些因素并未解释牧民差异。虽然与旱季家庭粮食不安全加剧相关的唯一高度重要的因素是土地占有率低,但在雨季,这是牧民的生计,农牧民的牲畜保有量低以及社会网络不参与。 ud ud该模型确定了许多描述家庭粮食不安全的重要因素,仅解释了约10%的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号