首页> 外文OA文献 >The attitudes of certain British statesmen in regard to British colonial policy in South Africa, 1875--1895
【2h】

The attitudes of certain British statesmen in regard to British colonial policy in South Africa, 1875--1895

机译:1875--1895年,某些英国政治家对英国在南非的殖民政策的态度

摘要

A nationu27s policy, whether it be foreign, colonial, or domestic, is determined by the interests of that country with due consideration of existing circumstances. The carrying out of this policy, however, is delegated to one man or to a group of men. The rigor and exactitude with which the policy is executed is dependent upon the political sagacity, natural ability and personal attitude of the man or men to whom this responsibility is intrusted. Herein lies the purpose of this thesis, which is a study of the attitudes of seven British statesmen, Disraeli, Gladstone, Chamberlain, Carnarvon, Kimberly, Shepstone, and Frere, in regard to the colonial policy of England in South Africa from 1875 to 1895. In a general way, Englandu27s colonial ambitions are well known. u22The sun never sets on English soilu22, because when treaties are being signed the Britishers make no bid for European territory but are quite content to pick up choice bits of land scattered all over the globe. The sentimentalist would say that England is merely assuming her share of u22the white manu27s burdenu22. The materialist would not deny this entirely, but would quietly realize that England was also deeply interested in the profitable business of feathering her nest with gold. England in her relations with South Africa has been motivated by economic desires and political ambitions. In the case of certain individuals however, this motive was modified by an abhorrence of the brutality and cruelty which was the inevitable result of the unchecked exploitation of the Natives. The question then arises as to what extent the sentiment and action of these individuals influenced the course of events in South Africa While there has been a vast amount of material written about South Africa, none of it deals with the attitudes of the people involved except in an incidental manner. It was on the assumption that menu27s attitudes determine their actions that this thesis was written.
机译:一个国家的政策,无论是外国的,殖民的还是国内的,都是由该国的利益决定的,并适当考虑了现有情况。但是,这项政策的执行被委派给一个人或一群人。执行该政策的严密性和正确性取决于被赋予这一责任的一个人的政治智慧,自然能力和个人态度。本文的目的在于研究七个英国政治家迪斯雷利,格拉德斯通,张伯伦,卡那封,金伯利,谢泼斯通和弗雷尔对1875年至1895年英格兰在南非的殖民政策的态度一般来说,英格兰的殖民野心是众所周知的。太阳永远不会落在英国的土地上,因为签署条约时,英国人不愿竞标欧洲领土,但他们很满足于选择零星遍布全球的土地。知情主义者会说,英格兰只是在承担白人负担。唯物主义者不会完全否认这一点,但会悄悄地意识到,英格兰也对用金羽毛筑巢的盈利业务深感兴趣。英国与南非的关系一直是出于经济愿望和政治抱负。但是,对于某些人,这种动机被对残酷和残酷的憎恶所改变,这是对土著人不受制止剥削的必然结果。于是就出现了一个问题,即这些人的情感和行为在多大程度上影响了南非的事件进程。尽管有大量关于南非的文献,但除了南非的观点外,没有任何一个涉及所涉人民的态度。偶然的方式。正是基于人们的态度决定他们的行动的假设,本论文才得以撰写。

著录项

  • 作者

    Norris Ellihu Q;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1936
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号