首页> 外文OA文献 >Heterotopias of mental health care: The role of space in experiences of distress, madness and mental health service use.
【2h】

Heterotopias of mental health care: The role of space in experiences of distress, madness and mental health service use.

机译:精神保健的异视症:空间在遇险,疯狂和精神保健服务使用中的作用。

摘要

The change from an institutional to community care model of mental health services can be seen as a fundamental spatial change in the lives of service users (Payne, 1999; Symonds & Kelly, 1998; Wolch & Philo, 2000). It has been argued that little attention has been paid to the experience of the specific sites of mental health care, due to a utopic (idealised and placeless) idea of ‘community’ present in ‘community care’ (Symonds, 1998). This project hence explored the role of space in service users’ experiences, both of mental health care, and community living. Seventeen ‘spatial interviews’ with service users, utilising participatory mapping techniques (Gould & White, 1974; Herlihy & Knapp, 2003; Pain & Francis, 2003), plus seven, already published first person narratives of distress (Hornstein, 2009), were analysed using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). Mental health service sites are argued to have been described as heterotopias (Foucault, 1986a) of a ‘control society’ (Deleuze, 1992), dominated by observation and the administration of risk (Rose, 1998a), which can in turn be seen to make visible (Hetherington, 2011) to service users a passive and stigmatised subject position (Scheff, 1974; 1999). Such visible positioning can be seen to ‘modulate’ (Deleuze, 1992) participants’ experiences in mainstream space. The management of space has hence been argued to be a central issue in the production and management of distress and madness in the community, both in terms of a differential experience of spaces as ‘concordant’ or ‘discordant’ with distress, and with movement through space being described as a key mediator of experiences of distress. It is argued that this consideration of space has profound implications for the ‘social inclusion’ agenda (Spandler, 2007; Wallcraft, 2001).
机译:从精神卫生服务的机构护理模式向社区护理模式的转变可以看作是服务使用者生活中的根本性空间变化(Payne,1999; Symonds&Kelly,1998; Wolch&Philo,2000)。有人争辩说,由于“社区保健”中存在“社区”的异议(理想化和无地方化),因此人们很少关注精神保健的特定场所的经验(Symonds,1998)。因此,该项目探讨了空间在心理健康护理和社区生活中在服务用户体验中的作用。利用参与式地图绘制技术对服务用户进行了十七次“空间访谈”(Gould&White,1974年; Herlihy&Knapp,2003年; Pain&Francis,2003年),以及七项已经发布的遇险第一人称叙述(Hornstein,2009年)。使用主题分析进行分析(Braun和Clarke,2006年)。据认为,精神卫生服务场所被描述为“控制社会”(Deleuze,1992)的异位症(Foucault,1986a),主要由观察和风险管理(Rose,1998a)主导,这又可以被认为是(Hetherington,2011)向服务使用者显示被动和被污名化的主题位置(Scheff,1974; 1999)。这种可见的定位可以看作是“调制”(Deleuze,1992)参与者在主流空间中的体验。因此,空间管理被认为是社区苦恼和疯狂生产和管理中的一个中心问题,无论是作为苦难的“和谐”还是“不和谐”的空间差异体验,以及通过空间被描述为遇难经历的关键调解者。有人认为,对空间的这种考虑对于“社会包容”议程具有深远的意义(Spandler,2007; Wallcraft,2001)。

著录项

  • 作者

    McGrath Laura;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号