首页> 外文OA文献 >Separating interviewer and sampling-point effects
【2h】

Separating interviewer and sampling-point effects

机译:分离访问者和采样点效果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

"Data used in nationwide face-to-face surveys are almost always collected in multistage clustersamples. The relative homogeneity of the clusters selected in this way can lead to designeffects at the sampling stage. Interviewers can further homogenize answers within the smallgeographic clusters that form the sampling points. The study presented here was designed todistinguish between interviewer effects and sampling-point effects using interpenetratedsamples for conducting a nationwide survey on fear of crime. Even though one might, giventhe homogeneity of neighborhoods, assume that sampling-point effects would be especiallystrong for questions related to fear of crime in one's neighborhood, we found that, for mostitems, the interviewer was responsible for a greater share of the homogenizing effect than wasthe spatial clustering. This result can be understood if we recognize that these questions arepart of a larger class of survey questions whose subject matter is either unfamiliar to therespondent or otherwise not well anchored in the mind of the respondent. These questionspermit differing interpretations to be elicited by the interviewer." (author's abstract)
机译:“全国面对面调查中使用的数据几乎总是在多阶段的集群样本中收集。以这种方式选择的集群的相对同质性可能会在采样阶段产生设计效果。访问者可以进一步使构成地理区域的小地理集群内的答案同质化。此处提出的研究旨在使用互穿样本在全国范围内对犯罪的恐惧进行调查,从而区分访调员效应和采样点效应,即使考虑到社区的同质性,也可能会假设采样点效应对于与恐惧恐惧有关的问题,我们发现,对于大多数项目,访问者在同质化效果中所占的份额要比在空间聚类中所占的份额大。如果我们认识到这些问题是大类中的一部分,则可以理解这一结果。主题不熟悉的调查问题受访者的主观感受或其他方式。这些问题允许面试官得出不同的解释。”(作者摘要)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号