首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing technologies for municipal solid waste management using life cycle assessment methodology: a Belgian case study
【2h】

Comparing technologies for municipal solid waste management using life cycle assessment methodology: a Belgian case study

机译:使用生命周期评估方法比较城市固体废物管理技术:比利时案例研究

摘要

PurposeThe present study aims at identifying the best practice in residual municipal solid waste management using specific data from Liège, a highly industrialized and densely populated region of Belgium. We also illustrate the importance of assumptions relative to energy through sensitivity analyses and checking uncertainties regarding the results using a Monte Carlo analysis.MethodsWe consider four distinct household waste management scenarios. A life cycle assessment is made for each of them using the ReCiPe method. The first scenario is sanitary landfill, which is considered as the base case. In the second scenario, the refuse-derived fuel fraction is incinerated and a sanitary landfill is used for the remaining shredded organic and inert waste only. The third scenario consists in incinerating the whole fraction of municipal solid waste. In the fourth scenario, the biodegradable fraction is collected and the remaining waste is incinerated. The extracted biodegradable fraction is then treated in an anaerobic digestion plant.Results and discussionThe present study shows that various scenarios have significantly different environmental impact. Compared to sanitary landfill, scenario 4 has a highly reduced environmental impact in terms of climate change and particulate matter formation. An environmental gain, equal to 10, 37, or 1.3 times the impact of scenario 1 is obtained for, respectively, human toxicity, mineral depletion, and fossil fuel depletion categories. These environmental gains are due to energetic valorization via the incineration and anaerobic digestion. Considering specific categories, greenhouse gas emissions are reduced by 17 % in scenario 2 and by 46 % in scenarios 3 and 4. For the particulate matter formation category, a 71 % reduction is achieved by scenario 3. The figures are slightly modified by the Monte Carlo analysis but the ranking of the scenarios is left unchanged.ConclusionsThe present study shows that replacing a sanitary landfill by efficient incineration significantly reduces both emissions of pollutants and energy depletion, thanks to electricity recovery.
机译:目的本研究旨在使用来自比利时高度工业化和人口稠密地区列日的具体数据,确定残留城市固体废物管理的最佳实践。我们还通过敏感性分析和使用蒙特卡洛分析检查结果的不确定性来说明相对于能源的假设的重要性。方法我们考虑了四种不同的家庭废物管理方案。使用ReCiPe方法对它们中的每一个进行生命周期评估。第一种情况是卫生垃圾填埋场,被视为基本案例。在第二种情况下,将垃圾衍生的燃料馏分焚化,并将卫生垃圾填埋场仅用于剩余的切碎的有机和惰性废物。第三种情况是焚化全部固体废物。在第四种情况下,收集可生物降解的部分,并焚化剩余的废物。然后将提取的可生物降解级分在厌氧消化设备中进行处理。结果与讨论本研究表明,各种情况对环境的影响都大不相同。与卫生垃圾填埋场相比,方案4在气候变化和颗粒物形成方面对环境的影响大大降低。对于人类毒性,矿物消耗和化石燃料消耗类别,分别获得相当于方案1的影响的10倍,37倍或1.3倍的环境收益。这些环境收益归因于通过焚烧和厌氧消化进行的高能价。考虑特定类别,情景2中的温室气体排放量减少了17%,情景3和4中的温室气体排放量减少了46%。对于情景3,颗粒物形成类别的排放量减少了71%。 Carlo分析,但情景的排名保持不变。结论本研究表明,由于电力的回收,通过高效焚化替代卫生垃圾填埋场可显着减少污染物排放和能源消耗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号