首页> 外文OA文献 >Reply: Prophylactic Variceal Ligation Is Not Recommended for Patients Awaiting Live Donor Liver Transplant.
【2h】

Reply: Prophylactic Variceal Ligation Is Not Recommended for Patients Awaiting Live Donor Liver Transplant.

机译:答复:不建议等待活体供体肝移植的患者进行预防性静脉曲张结扎。

摘要

We thank Wai and colleagues1 for their comment on our article.2 Their experience is consistent with ours and different from that reported by Jutabha et al.3 In all 3 studies, the patients were liver transplant candidates and thus constituted a particular subgroup of patients with cirrhosis, as underlined also by Boyer.4 In our opinion, this favors the use of beta-blockers instead of banding for primary prophylaxis for at least 2 reasons. The first, as underlined by Wai et al., is the short follow-up before liver transplantation. In fact, as shown in Fig. 2 of our study, patients treated by ligation can bleed during treatment but not after variceal eradication unless varices recur. In contrast, patients taking beta-blockers present the same risk of bleeding over the same time period. As a result, a possible advantage of banding can be seen only after a long follow-up, which is unlikely in patients awaiting liver transplant as usually this occurs within 1 year. The other reason is that this group of patients is followed up intensively, and this may increase compliance to therapy. The use of beta-blockers does require dose adjustment and trying to maximize the dose tolerated by the patient.The 2 bleeding episodes from postbanding ulcers reported by Wai et al.1 are added to several others that have taken place during prophylactic treatment, including 2 events described in our study. Globally, the reported cases number at least 15, some of which have been fatal. In contrast, beta-blockers for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding have not caused fatalities thus far.5It is difficult to predict which patients are at risk for postbanding ulcer bleeding. Our patients bled 9 and 11 days after the first banding session, respectively. One was Child B7, and the other was Child C14. The patients treated by Wai et al.1 bled 8 and 9 days after the second prophylactic ligation. Shepke et al.6 reported 5 (7%) bleeding episodes from postbanding ulcers, 2 of them fatal. The latter happened 3 and 12 days after the first banding session, respectively. Triantos et al.,7 treating patients unable to take beta-blockers, reported 3 cases of variceal bleeding, all between the first and second prophylactic banding sessions. As most bleeding occurs after the first banding session, we think that longer intervals between sessions, advocated by some authors to overcome this problem,5 would not reduce this risk. In addition and not to be discounted, we found that the costs are reduced to a third when beta-blockers are used with respect to banding for primary prophylaxis in these patients. Thus, nonselective beta-blockers remain the therapy of first choice for primary prophylaxis in liver transplant candidates.
机译:我们感谢Wai和同事1对本文的评论。2他们的经验与我们的经验相符,与Jutabha等人的报道3不同。在所有3项研究中,这些患者都是肝移植患者,因此构成了特定的患者亚组。正如博耶(Boyer)所强调的那样,肝硬化。4我们认为,出于至少两个原因,这倾向于使用β受体阻滞剂而不是进行一级预防。 Wai等人强调,第一个是肝移植前的短期随访。实际上,正如我们研究的图2所示,除非经过静脉曲张治疗,否则经结扎治疗的患者在治疗过程中会出血,而在根除静脉曲张后则不会出血。相比之下,服用β受体阻滞剂的患者在相同时间段出现相同的出血风险。结果,只有在长期随访后才能看到束带的可能优势,这在等待肝移植的患者中不太可能出现,因为通常在一年内就会发生。另一个原因是该组患者得到了深入的随访,这可能会增加对治疗的依从性。使用β受体阻滞剂确实需要调整剂量并努力使患者所能耐受的剂量最大化.Wai等人1报道的2种绑扎后溃疡出血事件被添加到了预防性治疗期间发生的其他几例中,包括2种。研究中描述的事件。在全球范围内,报告的病例至少有15例,其中一些是致命的。相比之下,到目前为止,用于预防静脉曲张破裂出血的β受体阻滞剂尚未引起死亡。5很难预测哪些患者有扎扎后溃疡出血的风险。我们的患者在第一次绑扎后分别出血了9天和11天。一个是儿童B7,另一个是儿童C14。 Wai等[1]治疗的患者在第二次预防性结扎后8和9天流血。 Shepke等[6]报告了捆扎后溃疡有5次(7%)出血事件,其中2次是致命的。后者分别在第一次分组后的3天和12天发生。 Triantos等[7]治疗无法服用β受体阻滞剂的患者,报告了3例静脉曲张破裂出血,全部发生在第一次和第二次预防性绑扎之间。由于大多数出血发生在第一次绑扎会议之后,因此我们认为,一些作者主张克服此问题的更长会议间隔5不会降低这种风险。另外,我们也发现,在使用β-受体阻滞剂对这些患者进行一级预防时,成本降低了三分之一。因此,非选择性β受体阻滞剂仍然是肝移植候选者一级预防的首选疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号