Deadlock is a common phenomenon in software applications, yet it is ignored by most operating systems. Although the occurrence of a deadlocks in systems is not frequent, in some cases, the effects are drastic when deadlock occurs. The ongoing trend in processor technology indicates that future systems will have hundreds and thousands of cores. Due to this imminent trend in hardware development, the problem of deadlock has gained renewed attention in research. Deadlock handling techniques that are developed for earlier processors and distributed systems might not work well with multicore systems, due to their architectural differences. Hence, to maximize the utility of multicore systems, new programs have to be carefully designed and tested before they can be adopted for practical use. Many approaches have been developed to handle deadlock in multicore systems, but very little attention has been paid to comparing the performance of those approaches with respect to different performance parameters. To fulfil the above mentioned shortfalls, we need a flexible simulation testbed to study deadlock handling algorithms and to observe their performance differences in multicore systems. The development of such a framework is the main goal of this thesis. In the framework, we implemented a general a scenario, scenario for the Dining Philosopher's problem and scenario for the Banker's algorithm. In addition to these scenarios, we demonstrate the flexibility, soundness, and use of the proposed framework by simulating two different deadlock handling strategies "" deadlock avoidance (the Banker's algorithm) and deadlock detection (Dreadlocks). The deadlock detection is followed by deadlock recovery to resolve the detected deadlock. We also present result analysis for the different set of experiments performed on the implemented strategies. The proposed simulation testbed to study deadlocks in multicore systems is developed using Java. --Leaf i.
展开▼
