首页> 外文OA文献 >Live community architecture – a transformative feminist practice?udA critical exploration of the experiences of students involved in live community-based architecture projects
【2h】

Live community architecture – a transformative feminist practice?udA critical exploration of the experiences of students involved in live community-based architecture projects

机译:现场社区建筑-一种变革性的女权主义做法? ud对参与基于社区的实时建筑项目的学生的体验的批判性探索

摘要

Internationally, Universities have introduced live projects as an increasingly common component of architecture education. In these projects students are typically taken out of the classroom or studio, and prompted to work with clients and/or real-life situations ‘as a way of learning the theory and practice of architecture.’ (SSOA, p5) The range of project types that are considered ‘live’ is varied: from hands-on 1:1 construction to client-initiated and participatory community-based design projects. Both approaches offer a distinctively different pedagogic approach that challenge normative approaches to architectural education (which have been critiqued as fundamentally masculinist, individualist and exclusive). However I argue that it is involvement in live, community-based and co-creative architecture projects that offers the most powerfully feminist alternative.ududThis paper reflects on the experiences of over 60 students involved in live community-based architecture projects run at the School of Architecture, UWE, Bristol, UK over two academic years. These projects have involved students in creating a series of community pocket parks [fig 1]; feasibility and detailed design for a farm run by people with disabilities [fig 2]; portable recycled architecture, [fig 3] etc. The research investigates how their experiences affect their perceptions of the architectural design process and explores the pedagogical implications (using a structure drawn from radical transformative feminist pedagogies, in particular bell hooks and Paolo Friere).ududInitial findings suggest that in community-based projects, collaboration can generate space in which architecture students, academics and community clients work together to co-define the aspirations for their part of the city and design responses to transform their particular situation. As such these projects challenge the inherent power relations – not only between tutors and students, but also between professionals and amateurs. They begin to suggest a model of activist transformative feminist pedagogy that empowers participants, builds community and challenges traditional notions of architectural pedagogic practice.
机译:在国际上,大学已将实况项目作为建筑教育中越来越普遍的组成部分。在这些项目中,学生通常被带出教室或工作室,并被提示与客户和/或现实生活一起“作为学习建筑理论和实践的一种方式。”(SSOA,p5)被认为是“实时”的类型多种多样:从动手1:1构造到客户发起和参与式的基于社区的设计项目。两种方法都提供了一种截然不同的教学方法,对建筑教育的规范方法提出了挑战(这些方法被批评为从根本上是男性主义,个人主义和排他性的)。但是,我认为参与现场,基于社区和共同创造的建筑项目才是最有力的女权主义选择。 ud ud本文反映了60多名学生参与了以社区为基础的实时建筑项目英国布里斯托大学,西澳大利亚大学建筑学院,历时两个学年。这些项目使学生参与了一系列社区袖珍公园的建设[图1];由残疾人经营的农场的可行性和详细设计[图2];便携式可回收建筑,[图3]等。研究调查了他们的经历如何影响他们对建筑设计过程的看法,并探讨了教育学意义(使用从激进的变革性女权主义教育学尤其是钟形钩和Paolo Friere汲取的结构)。初步研究结果表明,在基于社区的项目中,协作可以创造空间,建筑专业的学生,​​学者和社区客户可以在此空间中共同定义他们对城市的渴望,并设计应对方案以改变他们的特殊情况。因此,这些项目挑战了内在的权力关系,不仅是导师与学生之间,而且还包括专业人士与业余爱好者之间。他们开始提出一种激进的变革性女权主义教学法模型,该模型可以赋予参与者权力,建立社区并挑战传统的建筑学教学实践观念。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sara R.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号