首页> 外文OA文献 >Faculty perceptions of faculty evaluation programs at selected private colleges/universities in the southeast United States
【2h】

Faculty perceptions of faculty evaluation programs at selected private colleges/universities in the southeast United States

机译:美国东南部某些私立学院/大学对教师评估计划的教师看法

摘要

This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the faculty performance appraisal programs at the participating institutions. Faculty perception, regarding the effectiveness of the faculty evaluation appraisal program at their institution can be an important part of assessing the program itself. The study attempted to identify whether or not faculty members perceive that faculty performance appraisal is effective? Institutions continue to have difficulty in implementing a successful faculty performance appraisal program (Cashin, 1978). This difficulty and the need for institutions to implement effective faculty performance appraisal programs were the rationale for this study. Through analysis of the appraisal programs of the participating institutions, the researcher sought to offer information which may assist other institutions in implementing faculty performance appraisal programs that are successful. Successful faculty performance appraisal programs are defined as programs that are effective in the area of true appraisal and lead to improved instruction. The study involved selected private “faith-based” universities/colleges in the Southeast United States. The full-time faculty (N= 290) of these private institutions were surveyed. The institutions combined serve approximately 6,000 students. Three of the institutions offer both undergraduate and graduate degrees and one institution offers undergraduate degrees only. Participants only evaluated their respective institutions; no institutions were specifically compared with other institutions. The population of the study was full-time faculty members of the aforementioned institutions. The data were analyzed using several strategies. Whereas this was a descriptive study, it was conducted using a survey relating to faculty perception of faculty performance evaluation. Initially, the data was reduced by analyzing the answers of the survey. The survey data were categorized into six main categories: Purpose of Evaluation, Criteria of Faculty Evaluation, Approaches of Evaluation-Teaching Performance, Approaches of Evaluation- Scholarship/Research Performance, and Use of Faculty Evaluation. These responses were analyzed according to how the components of faculty evaluation were emphasized. Means and standard deviation were the main statistical techniques used for the analysis of the data to answer the three research questions posed. The results of the study provided information pertaining to those components faculty perceive to be important within their respective evaluation programs (in rank order). Participants identified areas such as Purposes of Evaluation, Criteria of Faculty, Approaches to Faculty Evaluation: Faculty’s Teaching Performance, Approaches of Evaluation: Faculty’s Scholarship or Research Performance, and Uses of Faculty Evaluation. Information gathered during the study indicated that 60.2% of faculty perceive the evaluation program at their institution accurately measured overall performance. The study also revealed that 63.1% of respondents were “satisfied” with the present process of evaluation at their institution; 11.7% responded they were “very dissatisfied” with the present process of evaluation at their institution.
机译:进行这项研究是为了确定参与机构的教师绩效评估计划的有效性。关于教师评估评估计划在其所在​​机构的有效性,教师的看法可能是评估计划本身的重要组成部分。该研究试图确定教师是否认为教师绩效评估是有效的?机构继续难以实施成功的教师绩效评估计划(Cashin,1978)。这种困难以及机构实施有效的教师绩效评估计划的需求是本研究的理由。通过对参与机构的评估计划的分析,研究人员寻求提供信息,以帮助其他机构实施成功的教师绩效评估计划。成功的教师绩效评估计划被定义为在真实评估领域有效并且可以改进教学的计划。该研究涉及美国东南部的一些精选的“基于信仰的”私立大学/学院。对这些私人机构的全职教师(N = 290)进行了调查。这些机构合计为大约6,000名学生提供服务。其中三所院校同时提供本科和研究生学位,而一所院校仅提供本科学位。参加者仅评估各自的机构;没有将任何机构与其他机构进行专门比较。研究人群是上述机构的全职教师。使用几种策略对数据进行了分析。尽管这是一项描述性研究,但是它是使用与教师对教师绩效评估的看法有关的调查进行的。最初,通过分析调查的答案来减少数据。调查数据分为六个主要类别:评估目的,教师评估标准,评估方法-教学绩效,评估方法-奖学金/研究绩效以及教师评估的使用。根据如何强调教师评估的组成部分来分析这些响应。均值和标准差是用于分析数据的主要统计技术,用于回答提出的三个研究问题。研究结果提供了与教师认为在其各自的评估计划(按等级顺序)中重要的那些组件有关的信息。参与者确定了诸如评估目的,教师标准,教师评估方法:教师的教学绩效,评估方法:教师的奖学金或研究绩效以及教师评估的用途等领域。在研究过程中收集的信息表明,有60.2%的教师认为他们所在机构的评估计划准确地衡量了整体表现。该研究还显示,63.1%的受访者对自己机构目前的评估过程“满意”。 11.7%的受访者对他们所在机构目前的评估过程“非常不满意”。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rector Jeffrey L.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:19:25

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号