首页> 外文OA文献 >Financial Globalisation Dynamic Thresholds for Financial Development: Evidence from Africa
【2h】

Financial Globalisation Dynamic Thresholds for Financial Development: Evidence from Africa

机译:金融全球化金融发展的动态门槛:来自非洲的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose - We investigate if financial development benefits from financial globalisation are questionable until certain thresholds of financial globalisation are attained. Design/methodology/approach - Financial globalisation is proxied with Net Foreign Direct Investment Inflows as a percentage of GDP (FDIgdp) whereas financial development entails dynamics of depth, efficiency, activity and size. The empirical evidence is based on; (i) data from 53 African countries for the period 2000-2011 and (ii) interactive Generalised Method of Moments with forward orthogonal deviations. Findings- The following findings are established. First, thresholds of FDIgdp from which financial globalisation increases money supply are 20.50 and 16.00 for below- and above-median sub-samples of financial globalisation respectively. Second, FDIgdp thresholds from which financial globalisation increases banking system activity and financial system activity for below-median sub-samples of financial globalisation are 13.81 and 13.29 respectively. Third, for financial size, there is evidence of: (i) a positive threshold of 21.30 in the full sample and (ii) consistent increasing returns without a modifying threshold for the above-median sub-sample. Practical implications- Evidence of a positive threshold implies that while the initial effect of financial globalisation on financial development is negative, there is a positive marginal effect, such that at a certain level of FDIgdp (or threshold), the overall effect of financial globalisation on the given financial development dynamic becomes positive. It follows that financial globalisation is both negative and positive for financial development, with a U-shaped relationship. Therefore the appropriate role of policy should neither be to stem the tide of capital flows nor to encourage them, but to understand what levels or thresholds of capital flows are required to benefit domestic financial development. Originality/value- We have extended the debate on initial or threshold conditions for the financial development benefits from financial globalisation by providing policy makers with levels of FDI (as percentage of GDP) that are required to start materialising financial development benefits from financial globalisation.
机译:目的-我们调查在达到金融全球化的某些阈值之前,从金融全球化中获得的金融发展收益是否值得怀疑。设计/方法/方法-金融全球化以外国直接投资净额占GDP的比率(FDIgdp)为代表,而金融发展则涉及深度,效率,活动和规模的动态变化。实证证据是基于; (i)2000年至2011年期间来自53个非洲国家的数据,以及(ii)具有正向正交偏差的交互式通用矩量法。结果-建立以下发现。首先,对于金融全球化子样本的中下方和上方,金融全球化增加货币供应量的FDIgdp的门槛分别为20.50和16.00。其次,对于金融全球化次中值样本中位数以下的子样本而言,金融全球化增加银行体系活动和金融体系活动的FDIgdp阈值分别为13.81和13.29。第三,对于财务规模,有证据表明:(i)整个样本中的门槛值为21.30,并且(ii)收益不断增加,而中位数子样本没有修改门槛。实际含义-阈值的正向证据表明,尽管金融全球化对金融发展的初始影响为负,但存在积极的边际效应,例如,在一定水平的FDIgdp(或阈值)下,金融全球化对给定的金融发展动力变得积极。由此可见,金融全球化对金融发展既有消极影响,也有积极影响。因此,政策的适当作用既不应是遏制资本流动的潮流,也不应该是鼓励资本流动的潮流,而是应了解为使国内金融发展受益而需要什么水平或阈值的资本流动。原创性/价值-我们通过向决策者提供开始实现金融全球化带来的金融发展收益所需的FDI水平(占GDP的百分比),扩大了关于金融全球化从金融发展收益的初始或临界条件的辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号