首页> 外文OA文献 >Glacier Surge Mechanism Based on Linked Cavity Configuration of the Basal Water Conduit System
【2h】

Glacier Surge Mechanism Based on Linked Cavity Configuration of the Basal Water Conduit System

机译:基于联管腔结构的基础输水管道冰川涌动机理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Based on observations of the 1982–1983 surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska, a model of the surge mechanism is developed in terms of a transition from the normal tunnel configuration of the basal water conduit system to a linked cavity configuration that tends to restrict the flow of water, resulting in increased basal water pressures that cause rapid basal sliding. The linked cavity system consists of basal cavities formed by ice-bedrock separation (cavitation), ∼1 m high and ∼10 m in horizontal dimensions, widely scattered over the glacier bed, and hydraulically linked by narrow connections where separation is minimal (separation gap ≲ 0.1 m). The narrow connections, called orifices, control the water flow through the conduit system; by throttling the flow through the large cavities, the orifices keep the water flux transmitted by the basal water system at normal levels even though the total cavity cross-sectional area (∼200 m^2) is much larger than that of a tunnel system (∼10 m^2). A physical model of the linked cavity system is formulated in terms of the dimensions of the “typical” cavity and orifice and the numbers of these across the glacier width. The model concentrates on the detailed configuration of the typical orifice and its response to basal water pressure and basal sliding, which determines the water flux carried by the system under given conditions. Configurations are worked out for two idealized orifice types, step orifices that form in the lee of downglacier-facing bedrock steps, and wave orifices that form on the lee slopes of quasisinusoidal bedrock waves and are similar to transverse “N channels.” The orifice configurations are obtained from the results of solutions of the basal-sliding-with-separation problem for an ice mass constituting of linear half-space of linear rheology, with nonlinearity introduced by making the viscosity stress-dependent on an intuitive basis. Modification of the orifice shapes by melting of the ice roof due to viscous heat dissipation in the flow of water through the orifices is treated in detail under the assumption of local heat transfer, which guarantees that the heating effects are not underestimated. This treatment brings to light a melting-stability parameter Ξ that provides a measure of the influence of viscous heating on orifice cavitation, similar but distinct for step and wave orifices. Orifice shapes and the amounts of roof meltback are determined by Ξ. When Ξ ≳ 1, so that the system is “viscous-heating-dominated,” the orifices are unstable against rapid growth in response to a modest increase in water pressure or in orifice size over their steady state values. This growth instability is somewhat similar to the jökulhlaup-type instability of tunnels, which are likewise heating-dominated. When Ξ ≲ 1, the orifices are stable against perturbations of modest to even large size. Stabilization is promoted by high sliding velocity ν, expressed in terms of a ν^(−½) and ν^(−1) dependence of Ξ for step and wave cavities. The relationships between basal water pressure and water flux transmitted by linked cavity models of step and wave orifice type are calculated for an empirical relation between water pressure and sliding velocity and for a particular, reasonable choice of system parameters. In all cases the flux is an increasing function of the water pressure, in contrast to the inverse flux-versus-pressure relation for tunnels. In consequence, a linked cavity system can exist stably as a system of many interconnected conduits distributed across the glacier bed, in contrast to a tunnel system, which must condense to one or at most a few main tunnels. The linked cavity model gives basal water pressures much higher than the tunnel model at water fluxes ≳1 m^(3/s) if the bed roughness features that generate the orifices have step heights or wave amplitudes less than about 0.1 m. The calculated basal water pressure of the particular linked cavity models evaluated is about 2 to 5 bars below ice overburden pressure for water fluxes in the range from about 2 to 20 m^(3/s), which matches reasonably the observed conditions in Variegated Glacier in surge; in contrast, the calculated water pressure for a single-tunnel model is about 14 to 17 bars below overburden over the same flux range. The contrast in water pressures for the two types of basal conduit system furnishes the basis for a surge mechanism involving transition from a tunnel system at low pressure to a linked cavity system at high pressure. The parameter Ξ is about 0.2 for the linked cavity models evaluated, meaning that they are stable but that a modest change in system parameters could produce instability. Unstable orifice growth results in the generation of tunnel segments, which may connect up in a cooperative fashion, leading to conversion of the linked cavity system to a tunnel system, with large decrease in water pressure and sliding velocity. This is what probably happens in surge termination. Glaciers for which Ξ ≲ 1 can go into surge, while those for which Ξ ≳ 1 cannot. Because Ξ varies as α^(3/2) (where α is surface slope), low values of Ξ are more probable for glaciers of low slope, and because slope correlates inversely with glacier length in general, the model predicts a direct correlation between glacier length and probability of surging; such a correlation is observed (Clarke et al., 1986). Because Ξ varies inversely with the basal shear stress τ, the increase of τ that takes place in the reservoir area in the buildup between surges causes a decrease in Ξ there, which, by reducing Ξ below the critical value ∼1, can allow surge initiation and the start of a new surge cycle. Transition to a linked cavity system without tunnels should occur spontaneously at low enough water flux, in agreement with observed surge initiation in winter.
机译:根据对阿拉斯加杂色冰川1982-1983年潮涌的观测,基于从基础水导管系统的正常隧道构型到倾向于限制水流的连接空腔构型的转变,开发了涌浪机制的模型。水,导致基础水压升高,导致基础快速滑动。相连的腔体系统由冰-基岩分离(空化)形成的基底腔体组成,高度约1 m,水平尺寸约10 m,广泛散布在冰川床上,并通过分离最小(分离间隙)的狭窄连接水力相连。 ≲0.1 m)。狭窄的连接口称为孔口,控制流经导管系统的水;通过节流大腔中的水流,即使腔的总截面积(〜200 m ^ 2)比隧道系统的总截面积大(〜200 m ^ 2),节流孔也能将基础水系统传输的水流量保持在正常水平。约10 m ^ 2)。链接腔系统的物理模型是根据“典型”腔和孔的尺寸以及横跨冰川宽度的数量来制定的。该模型着重于典型孔口的详细配置及其对基础水压和基础滑动的响应,从而确定了系统在给定条件下的水通量。对两种理想的孔类型进行了配置,一种是在面向冰川的基岩台阶的背风处形成的阶梯孔,另一种是在准海底基岩波的背坡上形成的波浪孔,类似于横向“ N通道”。孔的形状是从由线性流变的线性半空间构成的冰块的基础分离滑动问题解的结果中得出的,通过在直观的基础上使粘度应力相关来引入非线性。在局部传热的假设下,详细处理了由于流过孔口的水流中的粘性散热而导致的冰屋顶融化而导致的孔口形状变化,从而确保了不会低估加热效果。该处理揭示了熔化稳定性参数Ξ,该参数提供了粘性加热对孔口气蚀的影响的量度,对于阶梯孔和波状孔口相似但不同。孔的形状和屋顶回融量由determined确定。当≳≳1时,系统是“粘性加热控制”的,则由于水压或孔口尺寸超过其稳态值的适度增加,孔口在快速增长方面不稳定。这种增长不稳定性与隧道的jökulhlaupup型不稳定性有些相似,后者同样受加热影响。当≲≲1时,孔口稳定,不会受到中等到较大尺寸的干扰。较高的滑动速度ν促进了稳定性,滑动速度ν以阶跃和波腔的Ξ的ν^(-½)和ν^(-1)依赖性表示。计算阶跃和波节流孔类型的链接腔模型传递的基础水压力与水通量之间的关系,以求得水压力与滑移速度之间的经验关系以及系统参数的特定合理选择。在所有情况下,通量都是水压的增加函数,与隧道的通量-压力反比关系相反。结果,与必须凝结一个或至多几个主隧道的隧道系统相比,连通空腔系统可以稳定地存在,因为该系统有许多相互交叉的导管分布在整个冰川床上。如果产生孔口的床面粗糙度特征的台阶高度或波幅小于0.1 m,则在水流量为≳1m ^(3 / s)的情况下,链接腔模型给出的基础水压远高于隧道模型。评估的特定链接腔模型的计算基础水压比冰覆层压力低约2至5巴,水通量在约2至20 m ^(3 / s)的范围内,这与杂色冰川中的观测条件合理匹配激增相比之下,在相同通量范围内,单隧道模型的计算出的水压在表土之下约14至17 bar。两种类型的基础导管系统的水压差异为浪涌机理奠定了基础,该浪涌机理涉及从低压的隧道系统过渡到高压的连通腔系统。对于评估的链接腔模型,参数Ξ约为0.2,这意味着它们很稳定,但是系统参数的适度变化可能会导致不稳定。孔口的不稳定增长导致生成隧道段,这些隧道段可能以协作的方式连接起来,从而导致链接的空腔系统转换为隧道系统,大大降低了水压和滑动速度。这可能是电涌终止中发生的情况。 Ξ1的冰川可以涌入,而≳1的冰川则不能涌入。由于as随α^(3/2)的变化而变化(其中α为表面坡度),对于低坡度的冰川,Ξ的较低值更有可能,并且由于坡度通常与冰川长度成反比,因此该模型预测冰川的长度和涌动的可能性;观察到这种相关性(Clarke等人,1986)。由于with与基础剪应力τ成反比,因此在两次增高之间的堆积中,在储层区域发生的τ的增加会导致Ξ的减小,通过将reducing减小到低于临界值〜1,可以允许激增引发并开始新的喘振周期。应在足够低的水通量下自发地过渡到没有隧道的连腔系统,这与冬季观察到的涌浪潮一致。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kamb Barclay;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1987
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号