首页> 外文OA文献 >The long run share price performance of Malaysian firms issuing equity private placements. (Prestasi jangka panjang syarikat-syarikat Malaysia yang menerbitkan tawaran persendirian ekuiti).
【2h】

The long run share price performance of Malaysian firms issuing equity private placements. (Prestasi jangka panjang syarikat-syarikat Malaysia yang menerbitkan tawaran persendirian ekuiti).

机译:马来西亚公司发行私募股票的长期股价表现。 (马来西亚公司发行私募股权交易的长期业绩)。

摘要

The result of this study reveals an evidence of long run underperformance of equity private placements in Malaysiaudusing market index as a benchmark. When the firms are matched to firms with similar size and market-to-book, they neither over-perform nor underperform the matching firms over the three-year period under the equal-weighting scheme. However, a considerable difference exists between the CARs and BHARs under the value-weighting scheme. Unlike previous studies that find small firms underperform more than large firms, results of this study show the opposite. We find that large firms show greater degree of underperformance than small firms. The result definitely does not conform to the widely acceptable idea that smaller firms are more likely to issue equity when they are overvalued due to higher degree of information asymmetry. Further results indicate that the underperformance is driven by the outlier in the sample. When it is excluded from the sample, no significant result is detected for the two-year period. Nevertheless, it is interesting to note that for both CAR and BHAR, the underperformance under equal-weighted scheme is worse when the returns are benchmarked against market index but in sharp contrast, the underperformance under value-weighted scheme is worse when the returns are benchmarked against matching firms.
机译:这项研究的结果揭示了马来西亚股票私募长期表现不佳的证据,以市场指数为基准。当公司与规模和市净率相近的公司相匹配时,在等权重方案下,三年内它们既不会表现出色,也不会表现逊色。但是,在价值加权方案下,CAR和BHAR之间存在相当大的差异。与先前的研究发现小企业的表现不及大企业不同,本研究结果相反。我们发现,大公司比小公司表现出更大的绩效差。结果肯定不符合普遍接受的观点,即较小的公司由于信息不对称程度较高而被高估时更可能发行股票。进一步的结果表明,性能欠佳是由样本中的异常值驱动的。如果将其从样本中排除,则在两年内未检测到明显的结果。但是,有趣的是,对于CAR和BHAR而言,将收益与市场指数进行基准比较时,在等权重方案下的表现较差,但与之形成鲜明对比的是,在将收益基准化时,在价值加权方案下的表现较差。针对匹配的公司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号