首页> 外文OA文献 >Risk Stratification for Bipolar Disorder Using Polygenic Risk Scores Among Young High-Risk Adults
【2h】

Risk Stratification for Bipolar Disorder Using Polygenic Risk Scores Among Young High-Risk Adults

机译:使用年轻高风险成年人的多基因风险评分的双相障碍风险分层

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: Identifying high-risk groups with an increased genetic liability for bipolar disorder (BD) will provide insights into the etiology of BD and contribute to early detection of BD. We used the BD polygenic risk score (PRS) derived from BD genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to explore how such genetic risk manifests in young, high-risk adults. We postulated that BD-PRS would be associated with risk factors for BD.Methods: A final sample of 185 young, high-risk German adults (aged 18–35 years) were grouped into three risk groups and compared to a healthy control group (n = 1,100). The risk groups comprised 117 cases with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), 45 with major depressive disorder (MDD), and 23 help-seeking adults with early recognition symptoms [ER: positive family history for BD, (sub)threshold affective symptomatology and/or mood swings, sleeping disorder]. BD-PRS was computed for each participant. Logistic regression models (controlling for sex, age, and the first five ancestry principal components) were used to assess associations of BD-PRS and the high-risk phenotypes.Results: We observed an association between BD-PRS and combined risk group status (OR = 1.48, p < 0.001), ADHD diagnosis (OR = 1.32, p = 0.009), MDD diagnosis (OR = 1.96, p < 0.001), and ER group status (OR = 1.7, p = 0.025; not significant after correction for multiple testing) compared to healthy controls.Conclusions: In the present study, increased genetic risk for BD was a significant predictor for MDD and ADHD status, but not for ER. These findings support an underlying shared risk for both MDD and BD as well as ADHD and BD. Improving our understanding of the underlying genetic architecture of these phenotypes may aid in early identification and risk stratification.
机译:目的:鉴定对双相障碍(BD)的遗传责任增加的高风险群体将向BD的病因提供见解,并有助于早期检测BD。我们使用来自BD基因组 - 宽协会研究(GWAS)的BD多种子基风险评分(PRS)探讨了年轻,高危成年人的这种遗传风险表现。我们假设BD-PRS将与BD的风险因素相关联:185名年轻,高风险德国成人(年龄18-35岁)的最终样本被分为三个风险群体,并与健康对照组进行比较( n = 1,100)。风险群体组成117例,注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD),45例,具有主要抑郁症(MDD)和23名有帮助的成年人,具有早期识别症状[ER:BD的阳性家族史,(亚)阈值情感症状和/或情绪波动,睡眠障碍]。为每个参与者计算BD-PRS。 Logistic回归模型(控制性别,年龄和前五个祖先主要成分)用于评估BD-PRS和高风险表型的关联。结果:我们观察到BD-PRS与组合风险组状况之间的关联(或= 1.48,P <0.001),ADHD诊断(或= 1.32,P = 0.009),MDD诊断(或= 1.96,P <0.001)和ER组状态(或= 1.7,P = 0.025;纠正后不显着对于多种测试)与健康对照相比。结论:在本研究中,BD的增加的遗传风险是MDD和ADHD状态的重要预测因素,但不是ER。这些调查结果支持MDD和BD以及ADHD和BD的潜在共同风险。改善我们对这些表型的潜在遗传架构的理解可能有助于早期识别和风险分层。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号