首页> 外文OA文献 >Benefit of Report Card Feedback After Point-of-Care Assessment of Communication Quality Indicators
【2h】

Benefit of Report Card Feedback After Point-of-Care Assessment of Communication Quality Indicators

机译:报告卡反馈报告卡反馈后沟通质量指标的优惠评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: Communication is crucial for patient experience and biomedical outcomes. Training programs improve communication but are too resource-intensive for sustained use across an entire health care organization. This study demonstrates in a heterogeneous set of encounters the efficacy of quantitative feedback on two groups of physician communication behaviors: 1) jargon explanation, and 2) assessment of patient understanding. Methods: We used a secure Internet application to audio-record conversations between primary care physicians and 54 patients. Transcripts were quantitatively abstracted using explicit-criteria definitions for assessments of understanding and jargon explanations. These data were conveyed to physicians using a previously tested report card. Finally, physicians were audio-recorded with 48 other patients and compared against their baseline. Results: Baseline transcripts included an average of 15.5 unique jargon words. Many words were spoken more than once so the total jargon count averaged 25.1. Jargon explanations were infrequent (median of 2.6/ transcript). The jargon explanation ratio (fraction of jargon words spoken after or alongside a jargon explanation for that word) averaged 0.26 out of 1.0. Assessments of understanding were found in 61.1% of transcripts, but most were "OK?" questions (median of 2.22/transcript) or close-ended assessments of understanding (median of 0.59/transcript). After the report card, use of jargon explanations improved to a median of 4.8/transcript (P < 0.001), and the jargon explanation ratio improved to 0.37 (P < 0.02). Assessments of understanding improved to 81.3% of transcripts (P < 0.03), largely due to increased use of close-ended assessments of understanding to 1.08/transcript (P < 0.006). Conclusions: It is feasible to audio-record at the point of care, abstract transcripts at a central office and improve physician-to-patient communication quality via a report card. A larger, multifaceted program may improve patient experience and biomedical outcomes.
机译:用途:沟通是病人的经验和生物医学成果的关键。培训项目加强沟通,但都太耗费资源的,用于对整个医疗保健机构持续使用。这项研究在一组不同种类的遭遇证明了定量反馈两组医生沟通行为的有效性:1)专业术语的解释,和2)的患者了解评估。方法:我们使用一个安全的互联网应用的初级保健医生和54名之间的音频录制对话。使用明确的准则定义的理解和行话解释评估成绩单定量提取。这些数据传送到使用先前测试的成绩单医生。最后,医生们音频录制与其他48名患者和对他们的比较基准。结果:基线成绩单包括15.5独特的行话字的平均水平。许多词讲了话不止一次,所以总的行话数平均为25.1。行话解释是罕见的(中位数2.6 /成绩单)。行话说明比率(后或旁边该单词一个行话解释口语行话字分数)平均0.26总分1.0。了解评估在成绩单的61.1%被发现,但大多数是“OK?”问题(2.22 /成绩单的中位数)或谅解(0.59 /成绩单的中位数)封闭式评估。报告卡后,使用术语的解释提高到4.8 /转录(P <0.001)的中值,并且行话解释的比例可以提高到0.37(P <0.02)。的评估理解提高到转录物的81.3%(P <0.03),这主要是由于使用的理解到1.08 /转录(P <0.006)接近端评估的增加。结论:这是音频录制可行的医疗点,在中心局抽象的成绩单和提高通过成绩单医生和病人间的通信质量。一个更大的,多方面的方案可以改善患者体验和生物医学成果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号