首页> 外文OA文献 >Odstąpienie od wymierzenia kary oraz efektywność kar w sprawach o naruszenie dyscypliny finansów publicznych
【2h】

Odstąpienie od wymierzenia kary oraz efektywność kar w sprawach o naruszenie dyscypliny finansów publicznych

机译:撤回侵权公共财政刑事惩罚的惩罚和效率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The committee adjudicating in cases over violation of public finance discipline shall measure out the penalty at its own discretion, within the limits envisaged in the act, taking into consideration the degree of the fault and the effects and degree of harmfulness of the act for order of public finances, with due regard for the purposes of the penalty in its social impact and the preventive and educational purposes that it is to achieve for the punished person. In cases that deserve particular consideration, on taking into account the character and circumstances of the act or the personal features and conditions of the perpetrator, measuring out of a punishment may be refrained from. The following shall be penalties for violating public finance discipline admonition, reprimand, a fine, a ban on performance of managerial functions connected with disposing of public funds, for a period of 5 years from the day of validation of the adjudicating decision. The renouncement from the measurement of the punishment is an institution very often applied in practice of arbitrating of adjudication commission deciding in matters for the departure from discipline of public finance. In years 2010–2014 the number of matters which were ended with the renouncement from the measurement of the punishment exceeded the number of adjudication which measure out of penalties. Several research methods are used in the study, including dogmatic-exegetical, analytical and empirical method. Essential part of the article is based on analysis of the adjudication commission resolutions, reports of its activity, e.g. Reports of the Main Adjudication Commission in Cases Related to Violation of Public Finance Discipline and collective reports of the first instance adjudication commissions activities in 2010–2014. The output of Polish financial law doctrine was used in the study. Legal status valid for 19 March 2015 is applicable to this study.
机译:委员会在违反公共财政情况下判决,应当在该法案所设想的限制范围内以自行决定衡量罚款,同时考虑到过错程度以及行为的秩序秩序的危害程度和危害程度公共财政,适当考虑到其社会影响和预防和教育目的的刑罚,以至于它是为受惩罚的人实现的。在应得特别考虑的情况下,考虑到行为的性质和情况或犯罪者的个人特征和条件,可能会避免惩罚。以下禁止违反公共财政刑事委员会,谴责,罚款,禁止在裁决决策的当天,禁止违反公共资金的管理职能,禁止禁令。惩罚衡量的放弃是一项机构,经常在仲裁委员会仲裁裁决决定离开公共财政的纪律方面的实践中。 2010-2014年来,从惩罚的计量中排名结束的事项数量超过了判决的裁决次数。研究中使用了几种研究方法,包括教条诊断,分析和经验方法。本文的重要组成部分是基于分析裁决委员会决议,其活动的报告,例如,其活动报告。关于违反公共财政违规的案件的主要裁决委员会报告和2010 - 2014年第一次审判委员会活动的集体报告。在研究中使用了波兰金融法则的产出。法律地位有效期为2015年3月19日适用于本研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wojciech Bożek;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 pol
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号