首页> 外文OA文献 >Different Therapeutic Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper and Lower Limb Recovery of Stroke Patients with Motor Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis
【2h】

Different Therapeutic Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper and Lower Limb Recovery of Stroke Patients with Motor Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis

机译:经颅直流刺激对电动机功能障碍卒中患者的上下肢恢复的不同治疗作用:META分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective. To explore the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the motor recovery of stroke patients and the effect differences between the upper limb and lower limb. Methods. Randomized control trials published until January 2019 were searched from PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library databases. The standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated separately for upper and lower limb motor outcomes to understand the mean effect size. Results. Twenty-nine studies with 664 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The overall analyses of tDCS demonstrated significant effect size both for the upper limb (SMD=0.26, P=0.002) and the lower limb (SMD=0.47, P=0.002). Compared with acute and subacute stroke patients, chronic stroke patients obtained significant effects after tDCS (SMD=0.25, P=0.03) in upper limb function. Furthermore, both anode and cathode stimulations produced significant effect size for stroke patients after ≤10 sessions of tDCS (anode: SMD=0.40, P=0.001; cathode: SMD=0.79, P0.029 mA/cm2 of density (anode: SMD=0.46, P=0.002; cathode: SMD=0.79, P<0.0001). But for lower limb function, more prominent effects were found in subacute stroke patients (SMD=0.56, P=0.001) with bilateral tDCS (SMD=0.59, p=0.009). Conclusion. tDCS is effective for the recovery of stroke patients with motor dysfunction. In addition, upper limb and lower limb functions obtain distinct effects from different therapeutic parameters of tDCS at different stages, respectively.
机译:客观的。探讨经颅直流刺激(TDC)对卒中患者电机恢复的影响及上肢与下肢的效果差异。方法。从PubMed,Embase,SciErdirect和Cochrane Library数据库中搜索到2019年1月的随机控制试验。具有95%置信区间(CI)的标准化平均差异(SMD)分别估计上肢和下肢电机结果,以了解平均效果大小。结果。该荟萃分析中包含二十九项受试者的研究。 TDC的总体分析表明上肢的显着效果大小(SMD = 0.26,P = 0.002)和下肢(SMD = 0.47,P = 0.002)。与急性和亚急性中风患者相比,慢性中风患者在上肢功能中获得TDCS(SMD = 0.25,P = 0.03)后获得显着影响。此外,阳极和阴极刺激均为≤10次TDCs(阳极:SMD = 0.40,P = 0.001;阴极:SMD = 0.79,P0.029 MA / CM2密度(阳极:SMD = 0.79,P0.029 MA / CM2后产生显着的效果大小0.46,p = 0.002;阴极:SMD = 0.79,P <0.0001)。但对于较低的肢体功能,在亚急性中风患者(SMD = 0.56,P = 0.001)中发现了更显着的效果,具有双侧TDC(SMD = 0.59,P = 0.009)。结论。TDCs对脑卒中患者的卒中患者的复苏有效。此外,上肢和下肢功能分别从不同阶段的TDC的不同治疗参数获得不同的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号