首页> 外文OA文献 >Prednisone versus prednisone plus ciclosporin versus prednisone plus methotrexate in new-onset juvenile dermatomyositis: a randomised trial
【2h】

Prednisone versus prednisone plus ciclosporin versus prednisone plus methotrexate in new-onset juvenile dermatomyositis: a randomised trial

机译:泼尼松与泼尼松和泼尼松孢菌素对泼尼松加甲氨蝶呤在新出病的少年皮质肌炎中:随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Summary Background Most data for treatment of dermatomyositis and juvenile dermatomyositis are from anecdotal, non-randomised case series. We aimed to compare, in a randomised trial, the efficacy and safety of prednisone alone with that of prednisone plus either methotrexate or ciclosporin in children with new-onset juvenile dermatomyositis. Methods We did a randomised trial at 54 centres in 22 countries. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or younger with new-onset juvenile dermatomyositis who had received no previous treatment and did not have cutaneous or gastrointestinal ulceration. We randomly allocated 139 patients via a computer-based system to prednisone alone or in combination with either ciclosporin or methotrexate. We did not mask patients or investigators to treatment assignments. Our primary outcomes were the proportion of patients achieving a juvenile dermatomyositis PRINTO 20 level of improvement (20% improvement in three of six core set variables at 6 months), time to clinical remission, and time to treatment failure. We compared the three treatment groups with the Kruskal-Wallis test and Friedman's test, and we analysed survival with Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. Analysis was by intention to treat. Here, we present results after at least 2 years of treatment (induction and maintenance phases). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00323960. Findings Between May 31, 2006, and Nov 12, 2010, 47 patients were randomly assigned prednisone alone, 46 were allocated prednisone plus ciclosporin, and 46 were randomised prednisone plus methotrexate. Median duration of follow-up was 35·5 months. At month 6, 24 (51%) of 47 patients assigned prednisone, 32 (70%) of 46 allocated prednisone plus ciclosporin, and 33 (72%) of 46 administered prednisone plus methotrexate achieved a juvenile dermatomyositis PRINTO 20 improvement (p=0·0228). Median time to clinical remission was 41·9 months in patients assigned prednisone plus methotrexate but was not observable in the other two treatment groups (2·45 fold [95% CI 1·2-5·0] increase with prednisone plus methotrexate; p=0·012). Median time to treatment failure was 16·7 months in patients allocated prednisone, 53·3 months in those assigned prednisone plus ciclosporin, but was not observable in patients randomised to prednisone plus methotrexate (1·95 fold [95% CI 1·20-3·15] increase with prednisone; p=0·009). Median time to prednisone discontinuation was 35·8 months with prednisone alone compared with 29·4-29·7 months in the combination groups (p=0·002). A significantly greater proportion of patients assigned prednisone plus ciclosporin had adverse events, affecting the skin and subcutaneous tissues, gastrointestinal system, and general disorders. Infections and infestations were significantly increased in patients assigned prednisone plus ciclosporin and prednisone plus methotrexate. No patients died during the study. Interpretation Combined treatment with prednisone and either ciclosporin or methotrexate was more effective than prednisone alone. The safety profile and steroid-sparing effect favoured the combination of prednisone plus methotrexate. Funding Italian Agency of Drug Evaluation, Istituto Giannina Gaslini (Genoa, Italy), Myositis Association (USA).
机译:摘要背景大多数治疗皮肌炎和儿童皮肌炎的数据来自传闻,非随机病例系列。我们的目的是比较,在随机试验中的疗效及强的松单独的安全与泼尼松加在新发儿童皮肌炎的孩子无论是甲氨蝶呤或环孢素。方法我们没有在54个中心的一项随机试验在22个国家。我们招收患者年龄在18岁或更年轻的新发儿童皮肌炎谁没有收到以前的治疗,并没有皮肤或消化道溃疡。我们随机通过计算机为基础的系统,单独或与任何环孢素或甲氨蝶呤联合强的松分配的139例患者。我们并不能掩盖病人或研究人员对治疗的分配。我们的主要成果是患者达到一个少年的比例皮肌炎PRINTO 20水平的提高(在三六个核心变量的20%,提高6个月),时间到临床缓解,并及时治疗失败。我们比较了Kruskal-Wallis检验和弗里德曼的测试三个治疗组,我们分析了Kaplan-Meier曲线和log-rank检验生存。分析是意图治疗。这里,我们目前至少有2年的治疗(诱导和维持阶段)后的结果。这项试验是在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号NCT00323960。 2006年5月31日和2010年11月12日之间的调查结果,47名患者被随机分配强的松独自一人,46被分配泼尼松加环孢素,和46,随机泼尼松加甲氨蝶呤。随访时间中位数为35·5个月。在46 46分配泼尼松加环孢素,和33(72%)的47名患者分配泼尼松,32(70%)施用泼尼松加甲氨蝶呤实现少年月6,24(51%)皮肌炎PRINTO 20改善(p = 0 ·0228)。位时间为临床缓解率为41·9个月患者分配泼尼松加甲氨蝶呤但在其它两个治疗组(是不能观察到2·45倍[95%CI 1·2-5·0]增加泼尼松加氨甲喋呤,P = 0·012)。位时间为治疗失败率为16·7个月在分配泼尼松的患者,53·在那些分配泼尼松加环孢素3个月,但没有在可观察到的患者随机分配到泼尼松加氨甲喋呤(1·95倍[95%CI 1·20- 3·15]增加与强的松; p = 0·009)。位时间强的松停药是35·8个月单独用强的松29·4-29相比·在组合组7个月(p = 0时·002)。的患者显著更大比例分配泼尼松加环孢素有不良反应,影响皮肤和皮下组织,胃肠系统,和一般的疾病。感染和侵袭的分配泼尼松加环孢素和泼尼松加甲氨蝶呤患者显著上升。没有患者在研究期间去世。强的松,要么环孢素或甲氨蝶呤解读联合治疗比单独强的松更有效。在安全性和类固醇节约效应青睐泼尼松加甲氨蝶呤的组合。药品评价,因诺琴蒂基金会GIANNINA Gaslini(热那亚,意大利),肌炎协会的资助意大利署(美国)。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号