首页> 外文OA文献 >The REVAMP natural experiment study: the impact of a play-scape installation on park visitation and park-based physical activity
【2h】

The REVAMP natural experiment study: the impact of a play-scape installation on park visitation and park-based physical activity

机译:Revamp自然实验研究:Play-Scape安装对公园探视和公园的身体活动的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Designing parks that optimise visitation and support visitors to be active is important for public health. Yet there is very little evidence about whether playground refurbishment achieves these objectives. This study examined the impact of the installation of a play-scape in a large metropolitan park in Melbourne, Australia. Methods Natural experiment study (intervention vs control). At both parks, park visitation and physical activity were assessed before (T1, 2013) and after the intervention at 12 (T2, 2014) and 24 months (T3, 2015). At each time point, measures included: observations of park visitors using the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities on four weekdays and four weekend days, objective monitors to record usage of the walking paths and the number of cars entering the park; and intercept surveys with adult park visitors. Cross-sectional surveys were conducted with local residents at T1 and T3. Results The observational data showed a 176% increase in park visitor counts from T1 to T2 (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.04–7.33), at the intervention park relative to the control park. The intervention park had a 119% increase in counts of visitors observed engaging in MVPA from T1 to T2 (IRR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.14–4.20), and a 128% increase from T1 to T3 (IRR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.19–4.38), relative to the control park. The relative increases in visitation  at the intervention park play-scape compared with the control park playground were highly statistically significant from both T1 to T2 (IRR = 18.12, 95% CI = 5.51–59.59) and T1 to T3 (IRR = 15.05, 95% CI = 4.61–49.16). Similarly, there was a significant interaction between time and park with regard to the number of visitors observed engaging in MVPA in the play-scape/playground areas. The intercept survey data showed an increased odds of children’s regular visitation to the intervention park at T2 (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 1.08, 6.64), compared with T1, relative to the control park. The remaining results from the intercept survey, objective monitors and resident surveys showed no significant differences in visitation between the two parks. Conclusions These findings confirm that a well-designed play-scape installation has the potential to increase park visitation and encourage visitors to be physically active. Trial registration Current controlled trial ISRCTN50745547 .
机译:设计优化探视和支持访客的抽象背景公园积极对公共卫生非常重要。然而,有关游乐场翻新是否达到这些目标的证据很少。本研究审查了在澳大利亚墨尔本大都会公园安装戏剧的影响。方法自然实验研究(干预VS控制)。在公园,在第12(T1,2013)之前评估公园探视和身体活动,并在12月12日(T2,2014)和24个月(T3,2015)之后。在每个时间点,包括措施:使用该系统观察公园游客在4个平日和四个周末日观察社区的娱乐和娱乐,客观监视器记录步行路径的使用和进入公园的汽车数量;并与成人公园游客拦截调查。在T1和T3的局部居民用局部居民进行横截面调查。结果观察数据显示,从T1至T2(入射率比(IRR)= 2.76,95%CI = 1.04-7.33)相对于对照园区,Park游客计数增加176%(发生率比率= 2.76,95%CI = 1.04-7.33)。干预园的观察到从T1到T2接触MVPA的游客数量增加了119%(IRR = 2.19,95%CI = 1.14-4.20),并且从T1到T3增加了128%(IRR = 2.28,95% CI = 1.19-4.38),相对于对照园区。干预园游戏景观的探索的相对增加与控制园游乐场比T1至T2(IRR = 18.12,95%CI = 5.51-59.59)和T1至T3高度统计学意义(IRR = 18.12,95%)(IRR = 15.05,95 %ci = 4.61-49.16))。同样,时间和公园之间存在重大互动,关于观察到的游戏/游乐场地区的游客人数。与T1相对于对照公园相比,截距调查数据显示儿童定期访问干预园的差异增加了对T2(或= 2.67,95%CI = 1.08,6.64)的几率。拦截调查,客观监测和居民调查的剩余结果表明,两个公园之间的探索没有显着差异。结论这些调查结果证实,精心设计的戏剧安装有可能增加公园探视,并鼓励游客身体活动。试用登记目前对照试验ISRCTN50745547。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号