首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity >The REVAMP natural experiment study: the impact of a play-scape installation on park visitation and park-based physical activity
【24h】

The REVAMP natural experiment study: the impact of a play-scape installation on park visitation and park-based physical activity

机译:REVAMP自然实验研究:游乐设施对公园参观和公园体育活动的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundDesigning parks that optimise visitation and support visitors to be active is important for public health. Yet there is very little evidence about whether playground refurbishment achieves these objectives. This study examined the impact of the installation of a play-scape in a large metropolitan park in Melbourne, Australia. MethodsNatural experiment study (intervention vs control). At both parks, park visitation and physical activity were assessed before (T1, 2013) and after the intervention at 12 (T2, 2014) and 24?months (T3, 2015). At each time point, measures included: observations of park visitors using the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities on four weekdays and four weekend days, objective monitors to record usage of the walking paths and the number of cars entering the park; and intercept surveys with adult park visitors. Cross-sectional surveys were conducted with local residents at T1 and T3. ResultsThe observational data showed a 176% increase in park visitor counts from T1 to T2 (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR)?=?2.76, 95% CI?=?1.04–7.33), at the intervention park relative to the control park. The intervention park had a 119% increase in counts of visitors observed engaging in MVPA from T1 to T2 (IRR?=?2.19, 95% CI?=?1.14–4.20), and a 128% increase from T1 to T3 (IRR?=?2.28, 95% CI?=?1.19–4.38), relative to the control park. The relative increases in visitation at the intervention park play-scape compared with the control park playground were highly statistically significant from both T1 to T2 (IRR?=?18.12, 95% CI?=?5.51–59.59) and T1 to T3 (IRR?=?15.05, 95% CI?=?4.61–49.16). Similarly, there was a significant interaction between time and park with regard to the number of visitors observed engaging in MVPA in the play-scape/playground areas. The intercept survey data showed an increased odds of children’s regular visitation to the intervention park at T2 (OR?=?2.67, 95% CI?=?1.08, 6.64), compared with T1, relative to the control park. The remaining results from the intercept survey, objective monitors and resident surveys showed no significant differences in visitation between the two parks. ConclusionsThese findings confirm that a well-designed play-scape installation has the potential to increase park visitation and encourage visitors to be physically active. Trial registrationCurrent controlled trial ISRCTN50745547 .
机译:背景设计能够优化访问并支持游客活跃的公园对于公共卫生至关重要。然而,很少有证据表明游乐场翻新能否达到这些目标。这项研究研究了在澳大利亚墨尔本的大型都市公园中安装游乐场的影响。方法自然实验研究(干预与对照)。在这两个公园中,在干预之前(T1,2013)和干预后(12(T2,2014)和24个月(T3,2015))评估了公园参观和身体活动。在每个时间点,措施包括:在四个工作日和四个周末使用“观察社区游乐和娱乐系统”对公园的游客进行观察;客观的监视器记录步行路径的使用情况和进入公园的汽车数量;并拦截成人公园游客的调查。在T1和T3对当地居民进行了横断面调查。结果观察数据显示,与对照公园相比,干预公园从T1到T2的公园游客数量增加了176%(发生率(IRR)?=?2.76,95%CI?=?1.04-7.33)。从T1到T2,干预园区的MVPA访客数量增加了119%(IRR?=?2.19,95%CI?=?1.14-4.20),而从T1到T3(IR​​R?= 128)增加了128%。 =?2.28,95%CI?=?1.19–4.38),相对于对照园区。从T1到T2(IRR?=?18.12,95%CI?=?5.51-59.59)和T1至T3(IR​​R),干预公园游乐场所的参观人数相对于对照公园游乐场所的相对增加在统计学上具有显着意义。 ?=?15.05,95%CI?=?4.61–49.16)。同样,就观察到的在游乐场/游乐场地进行MVPA的游客数量而言,时间和公园之间存在显着的相互作用。截取调查数据显示,与T1相比,与T1相比,儿童在T2时定期探访干预公园的几率更高(OR?=?2.67,95%CI?=?1.08,6.64)。截取调查,客观监测和居民调查的其余结果表明,两个公园之间的参观人数没有显着差异。结论这些发现证实,设计合理的游乐设施有可能增加公园参观人数并鼓励游客进行体育锻炼。试用注册当前对照试验ISRCTN50745547。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号