首页> 外文OA文献 >Auricular Acupuncture and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia: A Randomised Controlled Study
【2h】

Auricular Acupuncture and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia: A Randomised Controlled Study

机译:失眠耳穴针灸和认知行为治疗:随机对照研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective. The most effective nonpharmacological treatment for insomnia disorder is cognitive behavioural therapy-insomnia (CBT-i). However CBT-i may not suit everyone. Auricular acupuncture (AA) is a complementary treatment. Studies show that it may alleviate insomnia symptoms. The aim of this randomised controlled study was to compare treatment effects of AA with CBT-i and evaluate symptoms of insomnia severity, anxiety, and depression. Method. Fifty-nine participants, mean age 60.5 years (SD 9.4), with insomnia disorder were randomised to group treatment with AA or CBT-i. Self-report questionnaires, the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep scale (DBAS-16), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD), were collected at baseline, after treatment, and at 6-month follow-up. A series of linear mixed models were performed to examine treatment effect over time between and within the groups. Results. Significant between-group improvements were seen in favour of CBT-i in ISI after treatment and at the 6-month follow-up and in DBAS-16 after treatment. Both groups showed significant within-group postintervention improvements in ISI, and these changes were maintained six months later. The CBT-i group also showed a significant reduction in DBAS-16 after treatment and six months later. Conclusions. Compared to CBT-i, AA, as offered in this study, cannot be considered an effective stand-alone treatment for insomnia disorder. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01765959.
机译:客观的。失眠障碍最有效的非药物治疗是认知行为治疗 - 失眠(CBT-I)。然而,CBT-我可能不适合每个人。耳廓针灸(AA)是一种互补治疗。研究表明它可能减轻失眠症症状。这种随机对照研究的目的是比较AA与CBT-I的治疗效果,并评估失眠症严重程度,焦虑和抑郁的症状。方法。五十九名参与者,平均年龄为60.5岁(SD 9.4),随机失眠障碍被随机分配给AA或CBT-I的组治疗。自我报告问卷,失眠症(ISI),关于睡眠量表(DBAS-16),欧洲呼吸睡眠规模(ESS)和医院焦虑和抑郁症(HAD)的功能障碍信念和态度(患有医院焦虑和抑郁症(HAD),治疗后收集,并在6个月的随访中。进行一系列线性混合模型以在组之间和内部内部的时间内检查治疗效果。结果。在治疗后和在治疗后的6个月随访和DBAS-16后,观察到群体之间的绩效群体改善。两组在ISI中显示出在群体内部初期内部改进,这些变化六个月后维持。 CBT-I组在治疗后和六个月后,DBAS-16也显示出显着减少。结论。与本研究中提供的CBT-I相比,AA不能被认为是失眠症的有效独立的治疗。该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01765959中注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号