首页> 外文OA文献 >Revisiting the Dexamethasone Suppression Test in unipolar major depression: An exploratory study
【2h】

Revisiting the Dexamethasone Suppression Test in unipolar major depression: An exploratory study

机译:重新审视单极性抑郁症中的地塞米松抑制试验:一项探索性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Important methodological questions still exist concerning the Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST), including the possibility of a better way of interpreting it. The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility of an alternative way of interpreting DST results. Methods: A total of 50 patients with major depression aged 41.0 ± 11.4 years old participated in the study. Past and present suicide attempts were recorded. Psychometric assessment included the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAS), the Newcastle Depression Diagnostic Scale (NDDS), the Diagnostic Melancholia Scale (DMS) and the General Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale. The 1 mg DST protocol was used. Analysis methods included the chi square test and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with Fisher least significant difference (LSD) as post hoc tests. Results: In all, 34 patients (68%) were suppressors, 16 (32%) were non-suppressors and 14 patients had cortisol values above 5 μg/dl at baseline. Baseline cortisol level did not influence the classical DST interpretation. A total of 18 patients (36%) showed an increase of their cortisol levels after dexamethasone administration and 32 patients (64%) showed a decrease. Reducers had less melancholic features, similar levels of depression, better sleep and less suicidal thoughts in comparison to increasers. No relationship of DST to suicidality was found. Discussion: The present study explored the pattern of cortisol response to dexamethasone suppression and suggested an alternative way of coding and interpreting the DST on the basis of whether the cortisol levels remain stable or increase vs decrease after the administration of cortisol. The results put forward a complex way of understanding the relationship of the DST results with clinical symptoms. © 2008 Fountoulakis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
机译:背景:地塞米松抑制试验(DST)仍然存在重要的方法论问题,包括有更好的解释方法。本研究的目的是探讨解释DST结果的另一种方法的可行性。方法:共有50例重度抑郁症患者,年龄为41.0±11.4岁。记录了过去和现在的自杀未遂。心理测量评估包括汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS),汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAS),新堡抑郁症诊断量表(NDDS),诊断性忧郁症量表(DMS)和功能综合评估量表(GAF)。使用了1 mg DST方案。分析方法包括卡方检验和协方差分析(ANCOVA),并采用Fisher最小显着差异(LSD)作为事后检验。结果:在基线时,共有34例患者(68%)为抑制剂,有16例(32%)为非抑制剂,有14例皮质醇值在5μg/ dl以上。基线皮质醇水平不影响经典DST解释。地塞米松给药后,共有18例患者(36%)皮质醇水平升高,而32例患者(64%)皮质醇水平降低。与增加者相比,减少者的忧郁症特征更少,抑郁程度相似,睡眠更好,自杀念头更少。没有发现DST与自杀有关。讨论:本研究探讨了皮质醇对地塞米松抑制的反应模式,并根据皮质醇给药后皮质醇水平是保持稳定还是升高还是降低而提出了另一种编码和解释DST的方法。结果提出了一种理解DST结果与临床症状之间关系的复杂方法。 ©2008 Fountoulakis等;被许可人BioMed Central Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号