首页> 外文OA文献 >Students#039; approaches to learning : a case study of learning biology in foundation studies at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University
【2h】

Students#039; approaches to learning : a case study of learning biology in foundation studies at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University

机译:学生'学习方法:皇家墨尔本理工大学基础研究中学习生物学的案例研究

摘要

The large influx of international students to universities of the developed world, the increased use of Problem-Based method of teaching and learning in the field of Health Education and growing awareness of the need to accommodate varying learning styles in any classroom are the three factors that influenced this research. This study was designed to investigate the effect of learning styles and demographic differences on performance in Biology when taught using two different methods of teaching. One was the teacher-directed Traditional Teaching and Learning (TTL) and the other was the student-centred Problem-Based Learning (PBL). The preferred learning styles of all Foundation Studies (FS) Biology students over four academic years at RMIT were determined using the Paragon Learning Style Inventory (PLSI). These students were taught two selected topics in Biology by the researcher using the two different methods and their performance assessed by a written test at the end of each topic. Two instruments were developed to assess student participation in PBL. The first instrument Students' Participation in Group Discussions (SPGD) rating scale was designed for teacher evaluation of student participation in PBL group discussions while the second instrument the Student Self Evaluation (SSE) rating scale was for self-evaluation by stud ents. Individual interviews provided students' views and opinions about their learning styles and the two teaching methods. The analysis of data was predominantly conducted by quantitative methods, supported by qualitative analysis of the interview data. Effect size analyses were used to investigate differences in performance under the two teaching methods on the basis of demographic and learning style differences. Further probes were conducted to elicit any interactions among the demographic variables and the learning style traits in their effect on performance under the two teaching methods and a quantitative measure for interaction was derived using effect sizes. While results confirmed some of the trends displayed by learning style traits in other disciplines, a number of interactions among variables were found to affect performance in Biology as well as performance under the two teaching methods. Gender, age, prior qualification and the language of instruction of prior education had various levels of interactions with the introvert/extrovert, intuitive/sensing, thinking/feeling and perceiving/judging learning traits and affected performance in Biology to varying extents. However, it was found that international students from diverse backgrounds were able to cope with both methods of teaching though there was a definite preference expressed for the traditional teacher directed method. The conclusions from this study have resulted in a number of recommendations for Biology educators, FS administrators, authors and all practitioners of PBL. Several suggestions have opened new avenues for future research. These recommendations for pedagogy and suggestions for future research can improve the outcomes of Biology education as well as other disciplines in related fields. As a consequence of this study two new instruments have been developed to assess student participation in the group discussions of PBL. These could prove to be valuable assessment tools for practitioners of this methodology.
机译:这是三个因素,这是导致国际学生大量涌入发达国家大学,在健康教育领域越来越多地使用基于问题的教学方法以及对在任何教室中适应不同学习方式的需求的日益增长的认识。影响了这项研究。本研究旨在研究使用两种不同的教学方法进行教学时,学习风格和人口统计学差异对生物学表现的影响。一个是老师指导的传统教学法(TTL),另一个是以学生为中心的基于问题的学习(PBL)。使用Paragon学习风格清单(PLSI)确定了RMIT四个学年中所有基础研究(FS)生物学学生的首选学习风格。研究人员使用两种不同的方法向这些学生教授了生物学上的两个选定主题,并在每个主题的末尾通过笔试评估了他们的表现。开发了两种工具来评估学生对PBL的参与。第一种工具学生参与小组讨论(SPGD)评分量表用于教师对PBL小组讨论中学生参与的评估,而第二种工具学生自我评估(SSE)评分量表用于学生的自我评估。个别访谈提供了学生对他们的学习方式和两种教学方法的看法和见解。数据分析主要是通过定量方法进行的,并且对访谈数据进行了定性分析。效果量分析用于根据人口统计学和学习风格差异调查两种教学方法下的绩效差异。在这两种教学方法下,进行了进一步的调查以找出人口统计学变量和学习风格特征之间的相互作用对他们对绩效的影响,并使用效应量得出相互作用的定量度量。虽然结果证实了其他学科中学习风格特征所显示的一些趋势,但发现变量之间的许多相互作用会影响生物学的表现以及两种教学方法下的表现。性别,年龄,先前资格和先前教育的教学语言与内向/外向,直觉/感知,思维/感觉以及感知/判断学习特质和生物学表现的不同程度的相互作用。但是,发现尽管背景明确表示偏爱传统的教师指导方法,但来自不同背景的国际学生能够应付这两种教学方法。这项研究的结论为生物学教育者,FS管理者,PBL的作者和所有从业者提出了许多建议。一些建议为将来的研究开辟了新途径。这些教育学建议和未来研究建议可以改善生物学教育以及相关领域其他学科的成果。这项研究的结果是,开发了两种新的工具来评估学生对PBL小组讨论的参与。对于这种方法的从业者,这些可能被证明是有价值的评估工具。

著录项

  • 作者

    Varughese V;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号