首页> 外文OA文献 >Analysing the Interactions between Water-induced Soil Erosion and Shallow Landslides
【2h】

Analysing the Interactions between Water-induced Soil Erosion and Shallow Landslides

机译:分析水源性土壤侵蚀与浅层滑坡之间的相互作用

摘要

Water-induced soil erosion and shallow landslides interact with each other and need to be studied in an integrated approach to understand hillslope sediment yields. The principal aim of this thesis was to study and model soil erosion and shallow landslides in an integrated way. The thesis presents results from laboratory and catchment-scale studies and modelling. A laboratory flume under a rainfall simulator was used for shallow landslide and soil erosion experiments using sandy and silty loess soils. In the experiments, landslide initiation, retrogressions and slip surface depths were measured and monitored directly or by using video camera recordings. Sediment and runoff were collected from the flume outlet every minute during landslides and every 10 minutes before and after landslides. Changes in the soil slope, after landslides, were recorded. Initially, six experiments including two repetitions were conducted using sandy soils at a 30º and 10º compound slope configuration, but with different soil profile depths. The experimental results showed that total and landslide-driven sediment yields were affected by the original soil profile depth; the greater the depth, the higher the sediment yield. Later, twelve other experiments were conducted on different slopes using silty loess soils. The experimental observations were used to validate an integrated modelling approach which includes WEPP for runoff and soil erosion modelling, a slope stability model for simulating shallow landslides, and a simple soil redistribution model for runout distance prediction. The model predictions were in good alignment with the observations. In all (sandy and silty loess) experiments, peak sediment discharges were related to the landslide events, proximity to the outlet and landslide volume. The post-failure soil erosion rate decreased as a function of changes in the slope profile. The GeoWEPP-SLIP modelling approach was proposed for catchment-scale modelling. The approach simulates soil erosion using the Hillslope and Flowpath methods in WEPP, predicts shallow landslides using a slope stability model coupled with the WEPP’s hillslope hydrology and finally uses a simple rule-based soil redistribution model to predict runout distance and post-failure topography. A case study application of the model to the Bowenvale research catchment (300 ha) showed that the model predictions were in good agreement with the observed values. However, the Hillslope method over-predicted the outlet sediment yield due to the computational weighting involved in the method. The Hillslope method predicted consistent values of sediment yield and soil erosion regardless to the changes in topography and land-cover in the post-failure scenarios. The Flowpath method, on the other hand, predicted higher values of sediment yield in the post-failure vegetation removal scenario. The effects of DEM resolution on the approach were evaluated using four different resolutions. Statistical analyses for all methods and resolutions were performed by comparing the predicted versus measured runoff and sediment yield from the catchment outlet and the spatial distribution of shallow landslides. Results showed that changes in resolution did not significantly alter the sediment yield and runoff between the pre- and post-failure scenarios at the catchment outlet using the Hillslope method. However, the Flowpath method predicted higher hillslope sediment yields at a coarser resolution level. Similarly, larger landslide areas and volumes were predicted for coarser resolutions whereas deposition volume decreased with the increase in grid-cell size due to changes in slope and flowpath distributions. The research conducted in the laboratory and catchment presented in this thesis helped understand the interactions between shallow landslides and soil erosion in an integrated approach.
机译:由水引起的土壤侵蚀和浅层滑坡相互影响,需要综合研究以了解山坡沉积物的产量。本文的主要目的是综合研究和模拟土壤侵蚀和浅层滑坡。本文介绍了实验室和流域规模研究与建模的结果。在降雨模拟器下的实验室水槽用于使用沙质和粉质黄土的浅层滑坡和土壤侵蚀实验。在实验中,直接或通过使用摄像机记录来测量和监测滑坡的始发,倒退和滑移表面深度。滑坡发生时每分钟以及滑坡发生前后每10分钟从水槽出口收集沉积物和径流。记录滑坡后土壤坡度的变化。最初,使用砂土在30º和10º复合坡度配置下,但土壤剖面深度不同,进行了包括两次重复在内的六个实验。实验结果表明,总的和滑坡驱动的泥沙产量受原始土壤剖面深度的影响。深度越大,沉积物产量越高。后来,又用粉质黄土在不同的坡度上进行了十二个实验。实验观察结果被用于验证一种综合的建模方法,该方法包括用于径流和土壤侵蚀建模的WEPP,用于模拟浅层滑坡的边坡稳定性模型以及用于预测径流距离的简单土壤重新分布模型。模型的预测与观察结果非常吻合。在所有(黄土和粉土黄土)实验中,最大的泥沙排放量都与滑坡事件,靠近出口和滑坡量有关。破坏后土壤侵蚀率随坡度变化而降低。提出了GeoWEPP-SLIP建模方法用于流域规模建模。该方法使用WEPP中的Hillslope和Flowpath方法模拟土壤侵蚀,使用斜坡稳定性模型与WEPP的Hillslope水文学相结合来预测浅层滑坡,最后使用基于规则的简单土壤重新分配模型来预测跳动距离和破坏后的地形。该模型在Bowenvale研究流域(300公顷)中的案例研究表明,模型预测与观测值非常吻合。但是,由于该方法涉及计算权重,Hillslope方法高估了出口沉积物的产量。希尔斯坡方法可以预测沉积物产量和土壤侵蚀的恒定值,而不管在破坏后情景中地形和土地覆盖的变化如何。另一方面,流径法预测了在破坏后的植被清除情况下较高的沉积物产值。使用四种不同的分辨率评估了DEM分辨率对方法的影响。通过比较流域出口处的径流量和沉积物产量以及浅层滑坡的空间分布,对所有方法和分辨率进行了统计分析。结果表明,使用希尔斯坡方法,分辨率的变化并没有显着改变集水口出口在故障前后情景之间的沉积物产量和径流。然而,流径法预测在较粗的分辨率水平下较高的山坡沉积物产量。同样,较大的滑坡面积和体积被预测为具有较高分辨率,而沉积物的体积则随着斜率和流路分布的变化而随着网格单元尺寸的增加而减小。在实验室中进行的研究和本文所介绍的流域,以综合的方式帮助理解了浅层滑坡与土壤侵蚀之间的相互作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Acharya Govind;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号