首页> 外文OA文献 >Nonlinear Dynamic Process Monitoring Using Canonical Variate Analysis and KernelDensity Estimations
【2h】

Nonlinear Dynamic Process Monitoring Using Canonical Variate Analysis and KernelDensity Estimations

机译:使用规范变量分析和内核的非线性动态过程监控密度估算

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and the Partial Least Squares (PLS) aretwo commonly used techniques for process monitoring. Both PCA and PLS assumethat the data to be analysed are not self-correlated i.e. time-independent.However, most industrial processes are dynamic so that the assumption of time-independence made by the PCA and the PLS is invalid in nature. Dynamicextensions to PCA and PLS, so called DPCA and DPLS, have been developed toaddress this problem, however, unsatisfactorily. Nevertheless, the CanonicalVariate Analysis (CVA) is a state-space-based monitoring tool, hence is moresuitable for dynamic monitoring than DPCA and DPLS. The CVA is a linear tool andtraditionally for simplicity, the upper control limit (UCL) of monitoringmetrics associated with the CVA is derived based on a Gaussian assumption.However, most industrial processes are nonlinear and the Gaussian assumption isinvalid for such processes so that CVA with a UCL based on this assumption maynot be able to correctly identify underlying faults. In this work, a newmonitoring technique using the CVA with UCLs derived from the estimatedprobability density function through kernel density estimations (KDEs) isproposed and applied to the simulated nonlinear Tennessee Eastman Process Plant.The proposed CVA with KDE approach is able to significantly improve themonitoring performance and detect faults earlier when compared to other methodsalso examined in this study.
机译:主成分分析(PCA)和偏最小二乘(PLS)是用于过程监控的两种常用技术。 PCA和PLS都假定要分析的数据不是自相关的,即与时间无关,但是大多数工业过程都是动态的,因此PCA和PLS做出的与时间无关的假设本质上是无效的。已经开发了对PCA和PLS的动态扩展,即所谓的DPCA和DPLS,以解决此问题,但不能令人满意。尽管如此,CanonicalVariate Analysis(CVA)是基于状态空间的监视工具,因此比DPCA和DPLS更适用于动态监视。 CVA是一种线性工具,为了简单起见,在传统上,CVA的监控指标的控制上限(UCL)是基于高斯假设得出的,但是大多数工业过程都是非线性的,高斯假设对此过程无效,因此CVA基于此假设的UCL可能无法正确识别潜在故障。在这项工作中,提出了一种使用CVA和UCL的新监控技术,该CCL是通过核密度估计(KDE)从概率密度函数估计得出的,并将其应用于模拟的田纳西伊士曼非线性工厂中。提出的使用KDE方法的CVA能够显着提高监控性能与其他方法相比,本发明还更早地发现了故障。

著录项

  • 作者

    Odiowei P. P.; Cao Yi;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号