首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Evaluation of Candidate Solvent Based Paint Strippers for the Replacement of Methylene Chloride Based Paint Strippers - Phase 2.
【24h】

Evaluation of Candidate Solvent Based Paint Strippers for the Replacement of Methylene Chloride Based Paint Strippers - Phase 2.

机译:用于替代二氯甲烷基涂料剥离剂的候选溶剂型涂料剥离剂的评价 - 阶段2。

获取原文

摘要

The stripping effectiveness of Fine Organics F0606 and Turco 5668 have been evaluated and compared to Oakite Stripper SA. Testing was carried out in the Chemical Cleaning Facility, FMF Cape Scott on pipe sections and elbows coated with a white powder epoxy coating as well as pipe brackets and valve covers coated with a black spray epoxy coating. All paint strippers were used m accordance with the manufacturers recommended procedures. The results indicate that Fine Organics F0606 removed 100% of the white powder epoxy coating after 4 hours and 90% of the black spray epoxy coating after 6 hours. This result was similar to the methylene cloned based stripper that removed 100% of the white powder epoxy after 2 hours and 100% of the black spray epoxy after 6 hours. However, Turco 5668 removed 95% of the white powder epoxy after 6 hours but less than 5% of the black spray epoxy after 24 hours. Monitoring of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) indicated that there were no serious health concerns with the use of N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP)/ethanolamine based solvents in properly ventilated cleaning facilities. A cost analysts ind1cated that Fine Organics F0606 was almost twice as expensive as Oakite Stripper SA (-$12.50 CNDIL versus -$7.00 CNDIL). The cost of Turco 5668, which was ineffective as a stripper for the black spray epoxy coating, was $13.30 CNDIL.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号