...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical engineering journal >Micropollutants removal from retentates generated in ultrafiltration and nanofiltration treatments of municipal secondary effluents by means of coagulation, oxidation, and adsorption processes
【24h】

Micropollutants removal from retentates generated in ultrafiltration and nanofiltration treatments of municipal secondary effluents by means of coagulation, oxidation, and adsorption processes

机译:通过凝结,氧化和吸附过程,从市政二次废水的超滤和纳滤处理中产生的截留物中去除微量污染物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

One important disadvantage of using ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF) for reclamation of secondary effluents from municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is the necessity to dispose of the UF and NF retentates. Different advanced treatments including coagulation (iron and alum), oxidation (chlorine, permanganate and ozone) and powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption were compared for their efficiencies in removing 11 selected micropollutants and effluent organic matter (EfOM) from UF and NF retentates generated in the filtration of secondary effluents. Ozone exhibited better micropollutants and UV254 removal efficiencies than chlorine and permanganate. Similar abatement of organics was observed when the same specific oxidant dose was applied to UF and NF retentates. Coagulation preferentially removed high molecular weight compounds, being ineffective for the elimination of most micropollutants. In general terms, iron coagulation was more efficient than alum, since iron achieved higher DOC and UV254 removal at lower molar doses. In addition, PAC was an effective method for removing micropollutants, especially hydrophobic and aromatic compounds. The hybrid coagulation/ozonation process improved micropollutants and EfOM (DOC and UV254) removal. A specific ozone dose of 1 mg O-3 mg DOC-1 was able to almost completely remove selected micropollutants from the UF retentate. The final effluent, which is likely more biodegradable and less toxic, could be recirculated to biological treatment processes in the WWTP, avoiding the continuous discharge of non-biodegradable micropollutants through the WWTP effluents. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:使用超滤(UF)和纳滤(NF)回收市政污水处理厂(WWTP)的二次废水的一个重要缺点是必须处理UF和NF截留物。比较了包括凝结法(铁和明矾),氧化法(氯,高锰酸盐和臭氧)和粉状活性炭(PAC)吸附的不同高级处理方法,它们从产生的超滤和纳滤截留物中去除了11种选定的微量污染物和废水有机物(EfOM)。在二次废水的过滤中。臭氧比氯和高锰酸盐表现出更好的微污染物和UV254去除效率。当将相同的特定氧化剂剂量应用于UF和NF截留物时,观察到相似的有机物减少。混凝优先除去高分子量化合物,对消除大多数微污染物无效。一般而言,铁的凝结比明矾更有效,因为铁在较低的摩尔剂量下可获得较高的DOC和UV254去除率。另外,PAC是去除微量污染物的有效方法,尤其是疏水和芳香族化合物。混合混凝/臭氧化工艺改善了微污染物和EfOM(DOC和UV254)的去除。 1 mg O-3 mg DOC-1的特定臭氧剂量能够几乎完全从UF渗余物中去除所选的微污染物。最终的废水可能具有更高的生物可降解性和较低的毒性,可以在污水处理厂中再循环到生物处理工艺中,从而避免了不可生物降解的微污染物通过污水处理厂的废水不断排放。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号