...
首页> 外文期刊>Physiological Research >Distinct Effects of Acute Pretreatment With Lipophilic and Hydrophilic Statins on Myocardial Stunning, Arrhythmias and Lethal Injury in the Rat Heart Subjected to Ischemia/Reperfusion
【24h】

Distinct Effects of Acute Pretreatment With Lipophilic and Hydrophilic Statins on Myocardial Stunning, Arrhythmias and Lethal Injury in the Rat Heart Subjected to Ischemia/Reperfusion

机译:亲脂性和亲水性他汀类药物急性预处理对缺血/再灌注大鼠心脏的心肌昏厥,心律不齐和致死性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although both lipophilic and more hydrophilic statins share the same pathway of the inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase, their pleiotropic cardioprotective effects associated with the ability to cross cellular membranes, including membranes of heart cells, may differ. To test this hypothesis, isolated rat hearts were Langendorff-perfused either with simvastatin (S, 10 μmol/l) or pravastatin (P, 30 μmol/l), 15 min prior to ischemia. Control untreated hearts (C) were perfused with perfusion medium only. Postischemic contractile dysfunction, reperfusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias and infarct size were investigated after exposure of the hearts to 30-min global ischemia and 2-h reperfusion. Both lipophilic S and hydrophilic P reduced the severity of ventricular arrhythmias (arrhythmia score) from 4.3±0.2 in C to 3.0±0 and 2.7±0.2 in S and P, respectively, (both P<0.05), decreased the duration of ventricular tachycardia and suppressed ventricular fibrillation. Likewise, the extent of lethal injury (infarct size) determined by tetrazolium staining and expressed in percentage of risk area, was significantly lower in both treated groups, moreover, the effect of P was more pronounced (27±2 % and 10±2 % in 5 and P groups, respectively, vs. 42±1 % in C; P<0.05). In contrast, only S, but not P, was able to improve postischemic recovery of left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP; 48±12 % of preischemic values vs. 25±4 % in C and 21±7 % in P groups; P<0.05). Our results suggest that differences in water solubility of statins indicating a different ability to cross cardiac membranes may underlie their distinct cardioprotective effects on myocardial stunning and lethal injury induced by ischemia/reperfusion.
机译:尽管亲脂性和较亲水性的他汀类药物均具有相同的抑制HMG-CoA还原酶的途径,但它们与跨细胞膜(包括心脏细胞膜)的能力相关的多效心脏保护作用可能会有所不同。为了验证这一假设,在缺血前15分钟,用辛伐他汀(S,10μmol/ l)或普伐他汀(P,30μmol/ l)对离体的大鼠心脏进行Langendorff灌注。对照未处理的心脏(C)仅用灌注培养基灌注。在心脏暴露于30分钟的整体缺血和2小时的再灌注后,研究了缺血后的收缩功能障碍,再灌注引起的室性心律失常和梗塞面积。亲脂性S和亲水性P均使室性心律失常的严重程度(心律失常评分)从C的4.3±0.2分别降至S和P的3.0±0和2.7±0.2,(P均<0.05),缩短了室性心动过速的持续时间并抑制了心室纤颤。同样,通过四唑鎓染色确定并以危险区域百分比表示的致死性损伤程度(梗塞面积)在两个治疗组中均显着降低,此外,P的作用更为明显(27±2%和10±2% 5组和P组分别比C组的42±1%显着(P <0.05)。相比之下,只有S而不是P能够改善缺血性左心室发育压力的恢复(LVDP;缺血前值的48±12%,而C组为25±4%,P组为21±7%; P < 0.05)。我们的结果表明,他汀类药物在水溶性方面的差异表明其穿越心脏膜的能力不同,这可能是其对缺血/再灌注所致的心肌电击和致死性损伤的独特心脏保护作用的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号