...
首页> 外文期刊>Physiological measurement >Cerebral critical closing pressure estimation from Finapres and arterial blood pressure measurements in the aorta
【24h】

Cerebral critical closing pressure estimation from Finapres and arterial blood pressure measurements in the aorta

机译:从Finapres和主动脉中的动脉血压测量中估算出大脑的临界闭合压力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Estimates of cerebral critical closing pressure (CrCP) and resistance-area product (RAP) are often derived using noninvasive measurements of arterial blood pressure (ABP) in the finger, but the errors introduced by this approach, in relation to intra-vascular measurements of ABP, are not known. Continuous recordings of ABP (Finapres and solid-state catheter-tip transducer in the ascending aorta), cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV, bilateral Doppler), ECG and transcutaneous CO2 were performed following coronary catheterization. CrCP and RAP were calculated for each of 12 784 cardiac cycles from 27 subjects using the classical linear regression (LR) of the instantaneous CBFV ABP relationship and also the first harmonic (H-1) of the Fourier transform. There was a better agreement between LR and H-1 for the aortic measurements than for the Finapres (p < 0.000 01). For LR there were no significant differences for either CrCP or RAP due to the source of ABP measurement, but for H-1 the differences were highly significant (p < 0.000 03). The coherence functions between either CrCP or RAP values calculated with aortic pressure (input) or the Finapres (output) were significantly higher for H-1 than for LR for most harmonics below 0.2 Hz. When using the Finapres to estimate CrCP and RAP values, the LR method produces similar results to intra-arterial measurements of ABP for time-averaged values, but H-1 should be preferred in applications analysing beat-to-beat changes in these parameters.
机译:通常使用无创测量手指中的动脉血压(ABP)得出对大脑临界闭合压力(CrCP)和阻力区积(RAP)的估计,但是这种方法相对于血管内测量的误差ABP,尚不清楚。冠状动脉插管后连续记录ABP(升主动脉中的Finapres和固态导管尖端换能器),脑血流速度(CBFV,双侧多普勒),ECG和经皮CO2。使用瞬时CBFV ABP关系的经典线性回归(LR)以及傅里叶变换的一次谐波(H-1),对27个受试者的12784个心动周期中的每个心动周期分别计算CrCP和RAP。 LR和H-1在主动脉测量方面比Finapres更好(p <0.000 01)。对于LR,由于ABP测量的来源,CrCP或RAP均无显着差异,但对于H-1,差异非常显着(p <0.000 03)。对于大多数低于0.2 Hz的谐波,H-1的CrCP或RAP值之间的相干函数对于H-1而言明显高于LR。当使用Finapres估计CrCP和RAP值时,LR方法产生的动脉内测量值的时间平均值与ABP的动脉内测量结果相似,但在分析这些参数的逐拍变化的应用中,应首选H-1。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号