...
首页> 外文期刊>Physiological measurement >Real-time ultrasound measures of lumbar erector spinae and multifidus: reliability and comparison to magnetic resonance imaging
【24h】

Real-time ultrasound measures of lumbar erector spinae and multifidus: reliability and comparison to magnetic resonance imaging

机译:腰部竖脊肌和多裂症的实时超声测量:可靠性和与磁共振成像的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this work we examine the reliability and validity (in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging; MRI) of real-time ultrasound measures of lumbar erector spinae thickness. We also consider the between-day reliability of the lumbar multifidus muscle area as measured via ultrasound. 23 male subjects aged 21-45 years were measured three times over the course of nine days by one operator. The first (L1) through to the fifth (L5) lumbar vertebral levels were measured on the left and right sides. MRI was performed on the same day as first ultrasound scanning. For between-day intra-rater reliability, intra-class correlation co-efficients (ICCs), standard error of the measurement, minimal detectable difference and co-efficients of variation (CVs) were calculated along with their 95% confidence intervals and Bland-Altman analysis was performed. On Bland-Altman analysis, erector spinae thickness and multifidus area ultrasound measures 'agreed' with equivalent MR measures, though the correlation between MR and ultrasound measures was typically poor to moderate. For both ultrasound measures, the ICCs ranged from 'moderate' to 'excellent' at individual vertebral levels, although multifidus area (CV ranged from 8 to 15%) was less reliable than erector spinae thickness (CV ranged from 6 to 10%). 'Agreement' on Bland-Altmann analysis was present between days for all ultrasound measures. Averaging between sides and between vertebral levels improved reliability. Average erector spinae thickness showed a CV of 5.5% (ICC 0.77) and average multifidus area 6.2% (ICC 0.80).
机译:在这项工作中,我们检查了腰部竖脊肌厚度的实时超声测量的可靠性和有效性(与磁共振成像; MRI相比)。我们还考虑了通过超声测量的腰部多裂肌区域的日间可靠性。一位操作员在9天的过程中对23位21-45岁的男性受试者进行了3次测量。在左侧和右侧分别测量第一(L1)至第五(L5)腰椎水平。在第一次超声扫描的同一天进行MRI。对于日间评估者的可靠性,计算了类内相关系数(ICC),测量的标准误差,最小可检测差异和变异系数(CV)以及它们的95%置信区间和Bland-进行奥特曼分析。在Bland-Altman分析中,竖立脊柱厚度和多裂区超声测量与MR等效测量“同意”,尽管MR和超声测量之间的相关性通常差到中等。对于这两种超声测量,尽管多缝区域(CV为8%至15%)不如竖脊肌厚度(CV为6%至10%)可靠,但在各个椎骨水平上ICC的范围从“中度”到“优秀”。所有超声测量在几天之间都存在关于Bland-Altmann分析的“协议”。两侧之间和椎骨水平之间的平均改善了可靠性。直立脊柱平均厚度显示CV为5.5%(ICC 0.77),平均多缝区域为6.2%(ICC 0.80)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号