...
首页> 外文期刊>Physiological measurement >The influence of carbon monoxide bolus on the measurement of total haemoglobin mass using the optimized CO-rebreathing method
【24h】

The influence of carbon monoxide bolus on the measurement of total haemoglobin mass using the optimized CO-rebreathing method

机译:一氧化碳推注对优化CO再呼吸方法测量总血红蛋白量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The optimized carbon monoxide (CO) rebreathing method (oCOR-method) is routinely used to measure total haemoglobin mass (tHbmass). The tHbmass measure is subject to a test-retest typical error of ~2%, mostly from the precision of carboxyhaemoglobin (HbCO)measurement.We hypothesized that tHbmass would be robust to differences in the bolus of CO administered during the oCOR-method. Twelve participants (ten males and two females; age 27 ± 6 yr, height 177 ± 11 cm and mass 73.9 ± 12.1 kg) completed the oCORmethod on four occasions. Different bolus of CO were administered (LOW: 0.6 ml kg~(?1); MED1: 1.0 ml kg~(?1) and HIGH: 1.4 ml kg~(?1)); to determine the reliability of MED1, a second trial was conducted (MED2). tHbmass was found to be significantly less from theHIGH CObolus (776 ± 148 g) when compared to the LOWCO (791 ± 149 g) or MED1 CO (788 ± 149 g) trials. MED2 CO was 785 ± 150 g. The measurement of tHbmass is repeatable to within 0.8%, but a small and notable difference was seen when using a HIGH CO bolus (1.4 to 1.9% less), potentially due to differences in CO uptake kinetics. Previously, an improved precision of the oCOR-method was thought to require a higher bolus of CO (i.e. larger △%HbCO), as commercial hemoximeters only estimate %HbCO levels to a single decimal place (usually ± 0.1%). With the new hemoximeter used in this study, a bolus of 1.0 ml kg~(?1) allows adequate precision with acceptable safety.
机译:优化的一氧化碳(CO)再呼吸方法(oCOR方法)通常用于测量总血红蛋白质量(tHbmass)。 tHbmass量度法的重测典型误差为〜2%,主要是由于羧基血红蛋白(HbCO)测量的精度所致。我们假设tHbmass量对oCOR方法中CO浓注的差异具有鲁棒性。十二名参与者(十名男性和两名女性;年龄27±6岁,身高177±11 cm,体重73.9±12.1 kg)完成了四次oCORmethod。给予不同剂量的CO(低:0.6 ml kg〜(?1); MED1:1.0 ml kg〜(?1)和高:1.4 ml kg〜(?1));为了确定MED1的可靠性,进行了第二次试验(MED2)。与LOWCO(791±149 g)或MED1 CO(788±149 g)试验相比,HIGH CObolus(776±148 g)的tHbmass明显减少。 MED2 CO为785±150克。 tHbmass的测量值可重复至0.8%以内,但使用高CO推注(少1.4%至1.9%)时,观察到很小且显着的差异,这可能是由于CO吸收动力学的差异所致。以前,由于商业血氧仪只能将%HbCO水平估计到一个小数位(通常为±0.1%),因此认为提高oCOR方法的精度需要更高的CO团注(即更大的△%HbCO)。使用本研究中使用的新型血氧饱和度计,可以推注1.0 ml kg〜(?1)的剂量,从而可以达到足够的精度并具有可接受的安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号