...
首页> 外文期刊>Physiological measurement >Evaluation of regional work from ECG-gated SPECT images through solution of equations of continuity for fluids-mechanical cardiac work calculated using thin wall model
【24h】

Evaluation of regional work from ECG-gated SPECT images through solution of equations of continuity for fluids-mechanical cardiac work calculated using thin wall model

机译:通过心电图门控SPECT图像通过薄壁模型计算的流体力学心脏工作连续性方程的解来评估区域工作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Regional contraction work (RCW) of left ventricle (LV) was evaluated from cardiac perfusion images of ECG-gated single photon emission computed tomography (ECG-SPECT). The mechanical work was computed as a product of force and displaced distance. Force was determined from Laplace's law under a rectangle pressure. Deformation of wireframe representing LV was calculated from equations of continuity for two-dimensional fluids. Experiments were performed with homemade life-sized cardiac models. Total contraction work (TCW) and stroke work (SW) were 524.0 ± 166.1 mJ/beat and 709.8±169.5 mJ/beat, respectively, in normal subjects (n = 23). Moderate correlation was seen between TCW and SW (y =43.4+0.779 x, r = 0.815). The regional contraction amplitude (RCA), synchronous contraction index and RCW were 35.4±3.5%, 95.4±3.1% and 5.58±0.97 mJ cm ~2/beat in normal subjects, whereas those in patients with decreased ejection raction (EF)≤30% (n = 6) were 19.6±7.7%, 64.4±32.2% and 2.58±0.82 mJ cm ~2/beat (p < 0.0001, Student's t-test). There was a poor correlation between RCW and RCA (y = 1.648±0.116 x, r = 0.501) in normal subjects, suggesting that it might not be suitable to use RCA as an alternative to evaluate RCW.
机译:从ECG门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(ECG-SPECT)的心脏灌注图像评估左心室(LV)的区域收缩功(RCW)。机械功被计算为力与位移距离的乘积。力是在矩形压力下根据拉普拉斯定律确定的。根据二维流体的连续性方程计算代表LV的线框变形。实验采用自制的真人大小的心脏模型进行。正常受试者(n = 23)的总收缩功(TCW)和中风功(SW)分别为524.0±166.1 mJ /次和709.8±169.5 mJ /次。 TCW和SW之间存在中等相关性(y = 43.4 + 0.779 x,r = 0.815)。正常受试者的区域收缩幅度(RCA),同步收缩指数和RCW分别为35.4±3.5%,95.4±3.1%和5.58±0.97 mJ cm〜2 / beat,而射血比下降(EF)≤30的患者%(n = 6)为19.6±7.7%,64.4±32.2%和2.58±0.82 mJ cm〜2 / beat(p <0.0001,学生t检验)。在正常受试者中,RCW和RCA之间的相关性较差(y = 1.648±0.116 x,r = 0.501),这表明使用RCA替代评估RCW可能不适合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号