...
首页> 外文期刊>Physics and chemistry of the earth >Water vapor over Europe obtained from remote sensors and compared with a hydrostatic NWP model
【24h】

Water vapor over Europe obtained from remote sensors and compared with a hydrostatic NWP model

机译:从远程传感器获得的欧洲水汽,并与静水NWP模型进行了比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Due to its high-variability water vapor is a crucial parameter in short-term numerical weather prediction. Integrated water vapor (IWV) data obtained from a network of groundbased Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers mainly over Germany and passive microwave measurements of the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU-A) are compared with the high-resolution regional weather forecast model HRM of the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD). Time series of the IWV at 74 GPS stations obtained during the first complete year of the GFZ/GPS network between May 2000 and April 2001 are applied together with colocated forecasts of the HRM model. The low bias (0.08 kg/m~2) between the HRM model and the GPS data can mainly be explained by the bias between the ECMWF analysis data used to initilize the HRM model and the GPS data. The IWV standard deviation between the HRM model and the GPS data during that time is about 2.47 kg/m~2. GPS stations equipped with surface pressure sensors show about 0.29 kg/m~2 lower standard deviation compared with GPS stations with interpolated surface pressure from synoptic stations. The NOAA/NESDIS Total Precipitable Water algorithm is applied to obtain the IWV and to validate the model above the sea. While the mean IWV obtained from the HRM model is about 2.1 kg/m~2 larger than from the AMSU-A data, the standard deviations are 2.46 kg/m~2 (NOAA-15) and 2.29 kg/m~2 (NOAA-16) similar to the IWV standard deviation between HRM and GPS data.
机译:由于其高可变性,水蒸气是短期数值天气预报中的关键参数。从主要通过德国的地面全球定位系统(GPS)接收器网络获得的综合水汽(IWV)数据以及高级微波探测单元(AMSU-A)的无源微波测量值与高分辨率区域天气预报模型HRM进行了比较Deutscher Wetterdienst(DWD)。在2000年5月至2001年4月的GFZ / GPS网络的第一个完整年度中获得的74个GPS站的IWV的时间序列与HRM模型的共处预测一起应用。 HRM模型与GPS数据之间的低偏差(0.08 kg / m〜2)主要可以通过用来初始化HRM模型的ECMWF分析数据与GPS数据之间的偏差来解释。在此期间,HRM模型与GPS数据之间的IWV标准偏差约为2.47 kg / m〜2。配备有表面压力传感器的GPS站的标准偏差比天气站内插表面压力的GPS站低约0.29 kg / m〜2。应用NOAA / NESDIS总可沉淀水算法获得IWV并验证海上模型。尽管从HRM模型获得的平均IWV比从AMSU-A数据获得的平均IWV大约2.1 kg / m〜2,但标准偏差为2.46 kg / m〜2(NOAA-15)和2.29 kg / m〜2(NOAA -16)类似于HRM和GPS数据之间的IWV标准偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号