...
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophy, psychiatry, & psychology: PPP >Psychiatric Power and Its Reversals: Can We Keep Practice Humane?
【24h】

Psychiatric Power and Its Reversals: Can We Keep Practice Humane?

机译:精神力量及其逆转:我们可以保持人道实践吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Iliopoulos' paper is a timely intervention in the current crisis of psychiatry, a crisis that has not yet emerged in fully recognized form (cf Bracken 2008). There are few psychiatrically informed responses to Foucault (see, for example, Bracken [1995] and Roberts [2005]), so it is important for the conversation with Foucault's ideas to develop. Foucault showed those psychiatrists that would listen that power is ubiquitous and inescapable. Although some psychiatrists relish this power, many feel power is thrust upon them, and that they should use it humanely. Following Laing's critique of psychiatry, many people came to psychiatry with the aim of understanding the "mentally ill" with humanity, caring for them as suffering individuals, not simply incarcerating them as part of a universal trope of social hygiene. But power, the Hobbesian Leviathan, leaves you nowhere to hide.
机译:Iliopoulos的论文是对当前精神病学危机的及时干预,这种危机尚未以完全公认的形式出现(cf Bracken 2008)。对福柯的心理知情反应很少(例如,参见Bracken [1995]和Roberts [2005]),因此发展与福柯思想的对话非常重要。福柯展示了那些会听取权力无处不在且不可避免的精神科医生。尽管有些精神病医生喜欢这种力量,但许多人认为力量是强加给他们的,他们应该人道地使用它。在Laing批评精神病学之后,许多人进入精神病学的目的是了解人类的“精神病患者”,将他们照顾为受苦的个体,而不仅仅是将他们监禁为社会卫生普遍论的一部分。但是,霍布斯式的利维坦大帝(Hobbesian Leviathan)力量无处可藏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号