首页> 外文期刊>Philosophy, psychiatry, & psychology: PPP >Empowering Patients Is Good Medical Care
【24h】

Empowering Patients Is Good Medical Care

机译:赋予患者良好的医疗保健

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Walter and Ross rightfully argue that healthcare providers need to employ a less authoritarian, more empowering approach if they want to support patients' behavioral changes. They show how motivational interviewing (MI), informed by self-determination theory, engages patients and thus may inspire enduring changes. They ground these interventions in an important, new model of relational autonomy, emphasizing the patient's self-respect and self-cohesion as well as self-determination, and they show how patient-provider interactions influence these three aspects of autonomy. It may be surprising then, that in the first part of this essay, I argue that it is problematic for them to ground their empowerment model in the ethical obligation to respect patient autonomy. In the second part of this essay, I offer an alternative justification for their important practical recommendations, arguing that the obligation to empower patients derives not from the patient's autonomy rights, but from the provider's foundational responsibility to promote the patient's health and well-being.
机译:沃尔特(Walter)和罗斯(Ross)正确地辩称,医疗保健提供者如果想支持患者的行为改变,就需要采用一种威权主义更少,授权更多的方法。他们展示了在自决理论的启发下进行的动机面试(MI)如何吸引患者,从而激发持久的变化。他们将这些干预措施建立在一种重要的,新的关系自治模型上,强调了患者的自尊,自我凝聚力和自决能力,并且他们展示了患者与提供者之间的互动如何影响自治的这三个方面。那么,可能令人惊讶的是,在本文的第一部分中,我认为对于他们而言,将他们的赋权模式建立在尊重患者自治的道德义务上是有问题的。在本文的第二部分中,我为他们的重要实践建议提供了另一种辩护,认为赋予患者权力的义务不是源自患者的自主权,而是源自提供者促进患者健康和福祉的基本责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号