...
首页> 外文期刊>Phlebology >Reply to Letter Re: Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared with high ligation and stripping in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: Initial results of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Reply to Letter Re: Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared with high ligation and stripping in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: Initial results of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial

机译:对回信Re的回复:高结扎静脉曲张术中高结扎与剥离术与无高结扎术相比的腔内激光消融:多中心随机对照试验的初步结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dear Miss Aslam, Thank you very much for the honor and your effort to give us a detailed analysis of our work.You mentioned that we included 449 instead of the calculated 469 patients to reach full statistical power. As described in the paper we calculated a 10% drop out rate over 2 years. Full power would be reached with 422 patients so that the published data in this paper are indeed of some relevance. You are absolutely right that the primary endpoint is at 2 years. We thought the perioperative data concerning the comfort of the portrayed methods are so valuable that it was worth publishing them as it is one of the main points of interest for the patient to know how irritating a method may be.
机译:尊敬的阿斯拉姆小姐:非常感谢您的荣幸以及为我们提供详细工作分析的努力。您提到我们包括了449位患者,而不是计算出的469位患者,以实现全面的统计能力。如该论文所述,我们计算了两年内10%的辍学率。 422名患者将获得全部治疗能力,因此本文中发表的数据确实具有一定意义。您的主要终点是2年,这是绝对正确的。我们认为有关所描述方法的舒适性的围手术期数据非常有价值,值得将其发布,因为这是患者了解该方法可能有多刺激的主要兴趣点之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号