...
首页> 外文期刊>Physics in medicine and biology. >Validation of dose planning calculations for boron neutron capture therapy using cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
【24h】

Validation of dose planning calculations for boron neutron capture therapy using cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.

机译:使用圆柱体和拟人体模对硼中子捕获疗法进行剂量规划计算的验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper, the accuracy of dose planning calculations for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) of brain and head and neck cancer was studied at the FiR 1 epithermal neutron beam. A cylindrical water phantom and an anthropomorphic head phantom were applied with two beam aperture-to-surface distances (ASD). The calculations using the simulation environment for radiation application (SERA) treatment planning system were compared to neutron activation measurements with Au and Mn foils, photon dose measurements with an ionization chamber and the reference simulations with the MCNP5 code. Photon dose calculations using SERA differ from the ionization chamber measurements by 2-13% (disagreement increased along the depth in the phantom), but are in agreement with the MCNP5 calculations within 2%. The (55)Mn(n,gamma) and (197)Au(n,gamma) reaction rates calculated using SERA agree within 10% and 8%, respectively, with the measurements and within 5% with the MCNP5 calculations at depths >0.5 cm from the phantom surface. The (55)Mn(n,gamma) reaction rate represents the nitrogen and boron depth dose within 1%. Discrepancy in the SERA fast neutron dose calculation (of up to 37%) is corrected if the biased fast neutron dose calculation option is not applied. Reduced voxel cell size (6 cm from the phantom surface. Increasing discrepancy along the phantom depth is expected to be caused by the inaccurately determined effective point of the ionization chamber.
机译:在本文中,研究了在FiR 1超热中子束中进行脑和头颈部癌的硼中子俘获疗法(BNCT)剂量规划计算的准确性。圆柱水模型和拟人化头部模型被应用了两个光束孔径到表面的距离(ASD)。使用模拟辐射环境(SERA)处理计划系统进行的计算与使用Au和Mn箔的中子活化测量,使用电离室的光子剂量测量以及使用MCNP5代码的参考模拟进行了比较。使用SERA进行的光子剂量计算与电离室测量值相差2-13%(沿着幻像深度的分歧增加),但与MCNP5计算值相差2%之内。使用SERA计算的(55)Mn(n,γ)和(197)Au(n,γ)反应速率分别与测量值相差10%和8%之内,而在深度> 0.5时与MCNP5计算值相差5%之内距幻影表面1厘米。 (55)Mn(n,γ)反应速率表示氮和硼深度剂量在1%以内。如果未应用有偏差的快速中子剂量计算选项,则可以纠正SERA快速中子剂量计算中的差异(最高37%)。减小的体素像元大小(<或= 0.5 cm)可提高幻像表面上的SERA计算精度。尽管在射束模型中略微高估了超热中子和低估了热中子,但使用SERA系统的中子计算精度足以在两个研究距离的情况下进行可靠的BNCT治疗计划。对于距离幻影表面> 6 cm的深度,测量和计算的光子剂量之间的差异仍然不令人满意。沿着幻影深度的差异越来越大是由电离室的有效点确定不正确引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号