首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences >Percussive tool use by Tai Western chimpanzees and Fazenda Boa Vista bearded capuchin monkeys: a comparison
【24h】

Percussive tool use by Tai Western chimpanzees and Fazenda Boa Vista bearded capuchin monkeys: a comparison

机译:大西部黑猩猩和Fazenda Boa Vista具cap毛的卷尾猴使用打击乐器:比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Percussive tool use holds special interest for scientists concerned with human origins. We summarize the findings from two field sites, Tai and Fazenda Boa Vista, where percussive tool use by chimpanzees and bearded capuchins, respectively, has been extensively investigated. We describe the ecological settings in which nut-cracking occurs and focus on four aspects of nut-cracking that have important cognitive implications, namely selection of tools, tool transport, tool modification and modulation of actions to reach the goal of cracking the nut. We comment on similarities and differences in behaviour and consider whether the observed differences reflect ecological, morphological, social and/or cognitive factors. Both species are sensitive to physical properties of tools, adjust their selection of hammers conditionally to the resistance of the nuts and to transport distance, and modulate the energy of their strikes under some conditions. However, chimpanzees transport hammers more frequently and for longer distances, take into account a higher number of combinations of variables and occasionally intentionally modify tools. A parsimonious interpretation of our findings is that morphological, ecological and social factors account for the observed differences. Confirmation of plausible cognitive differences in nut-cracking requires data not yet available. (C) 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
机译:撞击式工具的使用对于关注人类起源的科学家特别感兴趣。我们总结了来自两个现场站点Tai和Fazenda Boa Vista的发现,对黑猩猩和有胡子的卷尾猴分别使用敲击工具进行了广泛的研究。我们描述了发生坚果破裂的生态环境,并着重研究了具有重要认知意义的坚果破裂的四个方面,即工具的选择,工具的运输,工具的修改以及为达到使坚果破裂的目的而进行的动作调节。我们对行为的相似性和差异进行评论,并考虑观察到的差异是否反映了生态,形态,社会和/或认知因素。两种都对工具的物理特性敏感,有条件地根据锤子的阻力和运输距离来调整锤子的选择,并在某些情况下调节冲击力。但是,黑猩猩更频繁地运输锤子,并且运输距离更长,要考虑到更多的变量组合,并且偶尔会故意修改工具。我们发现的一个简约解释是,形态,生态和社会因素造成了观察到的差异。确认坚果裂解中可能存在的认知差异需要尚未提供的数据。 (C)2015英国皇家学会出版的作者。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号