...
【24h】

Evolution: like any other science it is predictable

机译:进化:像其他科学一样,这是可预测的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Evolutionary biology rejoices in the diversity of life, but this comes at a cost: other than working in the common framework of neo-Darwinian evolution, specialists in, for example, diatoms and mammals have little to say to each other. Accordingly, their research tends to track the particularities and peculiarities of a given group and seldom enquires whether there are any wider or deeper sets of explanations. Here, I present evidence in support of the heterodox idea that evolution might look to a general theory that does more than serve as a tautology (‘evolution explains evolution’). Specifically, I argue that far from its myriad of products being fortuitous and accidental, evolution is remarkably predictable. Thus, I urge a move away from the continuing obsession with Darwinian mechanisms, which are entirely uncontroversial. Rather, I emphasize why we should seek explanations for ubiquitous evolutionary convergence, as well as the emergence of complex integrated systems. At present, evolutionary theory seems to be akin to nineteenth-century physics, blissfully unaware of the imminent arrival of quantum mechanics and general relativity. Physics had its Newton, biology its Darwin: evolutionary biology now awaits its Einstein.
机译:进化生物学为生活的多样性而欢欣鼓舞,但这是有代价的:除了在新达尔文进化论的共同框架中开展工作外,例如硅藻和哺乳动物的专家之间几乎没有话语权。因此,他们的研究倾向于追踪给定群体的特殊性和特殊性,并且很少询问是否有更广泛或更深层次的解释。在这里,我提出证据来支持异端观点,即进化可能会依赖于一个通用理论,而该理论的作用不只是重言式(“进化解释了进化”)。具体而言,我认为,进化并非是偶然的和偶然的,而是可以预测的。因此,我敦促摆脱对达尔文机制的持续痴迷,而这完全是没有争议的。相反,我强调为什么我们应该寻求无处不在的进化趋同以及复杂的集成系统的出现的解释。目前,进化论似乎类似于十九世纪的物理学,对量子力学和广义相对论的即将到来感到高兴。物理学有牛顿,生物学有达尔文:进化生物学现在正等待着爱因斯坦。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号